Path Integrals in Wolfram Mathematica

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the need to compute path integrals in SU(2) and SU(3) pure Yang-Mills fields using Wolfram Mathematica. The user, who is completing a physics thesis, expresses a lack of experience with Mathematica and seeks guidance on resources for using the saddle point method for path integrals. Responses clarify that the saddle point method is primarily analytical, but the user's mentor recommends Mathematica due to the complexity of the integrals involved. The user acknowledges their mentor's advice and is looking for further assistance in navigating this computational challenge. Overall, the conversation highlights the intersection of theoretical physics and computational tools in advanced studies.
Mitya
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone ! I am new to this site so I 'd better say hello to you all !

I am finishing my BR in physics and part of this ending is to deliver a thesis .

Long story short I must compute path-integrals in SU(2) and SU(3) pure yang-mills fields . Problem is that i was never very good with mathematica or computers in general , whilst i had excellent marks in my lessons (i think not one of them demanded using a computer except from computational physics and our professor back then didnt demand pure programming but ony pseudo) .

Anyway I would be hugely thankful , if someone would guide me to what I should see or read , to be able to compute some path integrals via the saddle point method .

Thank you so much .
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you want to use Mathematica for that?
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Mitya said:
Anyway I would be hugely thankful , if someone would guide me to what I should see or read , to be able to compute some path integrals via the saddle point method .
The saddle point method is an analytical (not a numerical) method, so I'm not sure that you really need a computer for that.
 
Hello thanks for the answers !

My mentor advised me to use Mathematica to proceed , as the integral is much complicated . I use non linear plane waves as solutions of the EoMs and the gauge fields especially is SU3 are too complicated for me to integrate them yet , i think .

I surely trust him , he must have a reason to tell me to do so .

Thanks !
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K