Pauli Equation - Simple operator algebra question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the Pauli Equation, specifically addressing operator algebra in the context of an electromagnetic field. The key issue discussed is the non-commutativity of operators and the resultant cross product, particularly focusing on the term \(\vec{p} \times \vec{A}\) as the only significant contribution. The user references Griffiths' E-M Rule 7 to clarify the operator priority and the implications of vector calculus in the derivation. The conclusion confirms that the vector multiplication in the equation is indeed a cross product, validating the derivation presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Pauli Equation and its significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with operator algebra and non-commutative properties of quantum operators.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly cross products and curl operations.
  • Experience with Griffiths' Electromagnetism concepts and rules.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Pauli Equation in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties of non-commutative operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore vector calculus applications in physics, focusing on curl and cross product operations.
  • Review Griffiths' Electromagnetism, especially Rule 7 and its applications in operator algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and electromagnetism, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of operator algebra in these contexts.

karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am watching a course on Relativistic Quantum Mechanics to freshen up, and I have found to have some issues regarding simple operator algebra. This particular issue on the Pauli Equation (generalization of the Schrödinger equation that includes spin corrections) in an electromagnetic field, arises from the cross product of a linear combination of operators, as shown below (and in the video link - time 18:18)



I understand that when the operators don't commute, the cross product isn't zero, but how is it shown explicitly that the only non-trivial effect is the \vec{p}\times\vec{A} that survives? What about the other term diagonal in the two operators?

Homework Equations


\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)=\frac{i\hbar e}{c}<br /> \vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been arguing why the second term \propto \vec{A}\times\vec{p} won't contribute but can't seem to reach it. Thinking about a crutch function didn't quite help as well. I'm pretty sure this is simple but can't think of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems I've pretty much forgot all of my vector calculus as well as operator priorities. I got the right thing though after some research on my textbooks

Rule 7 on Griffiths E-M: \vec{\nabla}\times\left(f\cdot\vec{A}\right)=f\left(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}\right)-\vec{A}\times\left(\vec{\nabla}\cdot f\right)
Also the priority of operator action starts from the left and encompasses all through to right, so our action should be:
\left[\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)\right]g=-\frac{e}{c}\vec{p}\times\left(\vec{A}g\right)-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\times\left(\vec{p}g\right)=i\hbar\frac{e}{c}\vec{\nabla}\times\left(\vec{A}g\right)+i\hbar\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\times\left(\vec{\nabla}g\right)=i\hbar\frac{e}{c}g\left(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}\right)-i\hbar\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\times\left(\vec{\nabla}g\right)+i\hbar\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\times\left(\vec{\nabla}g\right)=i\hbar\frac{e}{c}\left(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}\right)g

Correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I think it's done with.
 
If the vector multiplication in the left side of
$$
\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)=\frac{i\hbar e}{c}
\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}
$$
is actually a cross product, then your derivation is correct.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
If the vector multiplication in the left side of
$$
\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)\left(\vec{p}-\frac{e}{c}\vec{A}\right)=\frac{i\hbar e}{c}
\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}
$$
is actually a cross product, then your derivation is correct.

Ah, a misprint, will fix, thank you for the confirmation!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K