Pauli Exclusion Principle: how does an electron know its state?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP), which states that no two electrons in a poly-electron atom can share the same set of four quantum numbers (n, ℓ, mℓ, ms). Participants explore how electrons "know" the states of other electrons, concluding that electrons are excitations of the electron field, which inherently prevents them from occupying the same state. The conversation emphasizes that the PEP is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, rooted in the behavior of fermions and the underlying quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with quantum numbers (n, ℓ, mℓ, ms)
  • Knowledge of quantum field theory
  • Basic concepts of fermions and their behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Pauli Exclusion Principle in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about quantum field theory and its relation to particle physics
  • Explore the concept of excitations in quantum fields
  • Investigate the mathematical framework behind quantum mechanics and fermionic behavior
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of particle physics and quantum field theory.

Mr Wolf
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This is one of those question you won't find the answer in any book.

From Wikipedia: it is impossible for two electrons of a poly-electron atom to have the same values of the four quantum numbers (n, ℓ, mℓ and ms).

But how can an electron know the state (the quantum numbers) of the other electrons, that is, which states are already occupied and consequently occupy an available state?
Or, vice versa, it's the atom that "tells" (how?) the electron the states that are free and that it can occupy?

Thanks.

EDIT: Sorry, I've just noticed the error in the title. It was too long and I had to cut it, but I made a mistake.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Wolf said:
But how can an electron know the state (the quantum numbers) of the other electrons, that is, which states are already occupied and consequently occupy an available state?
That's why it's called principle as it cannot be proven, it's just the way how fermions behave.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Wolf
Thanks for your answer. I was just thinking about a similar answer, that is: it's a principle and that's all.
 
By the way the shell model of atom is actually based on the independent particle approximation, which means the labeling with four quantum numbers ##(n,l,m_l,m_s)## of each electron is also an approximation. The reason is that the single particle orbital angular momentum operator does not commute with the Hamiltonian, hence the numbers ##(n,l,m_l,m_s)## are not really good quantum numbers for many electron atoms. The actual good quantum numbers are found by finding observables that commute with the Hamiltonian and there should be 4N of such observables (and hence good quantum numbers) with N the number of electrons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Wolf
Mr Wolf said:
This is one of those question you won't find the answer in any book.

From Wikipedia: it is impossible for two electrons of a poly-electron atom to have the same values of the four quantum numbers (n, ℓ, mℓ and ms).

But how can an electron know the state (the quantum numbers) of the other electrons, that is, which states are already occupied and consequently occupy an available state?
Or, vice versa, it's the atom that "tells" (how?) the electron the states that are free and that it can occupy?

Thanks.

EDIT: Sorry, I've just noticed the error in the title. It was too long and I had to cut it, but I made a mistake.

The electrons don't "know" each others state. They are both excitations of the electron field, which cannot be in a state which doesn't obey the PEP.

Try this for a start:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Wolf
Thanks for your answers.

I studied many of these things some years ago. So, perhaps I was too naive to look for a simple answer. :rolleyes:
 
Mr Wolf said:
So, perhaps I was too naive to look for a simple answer. :rolleyes:

There is no simple answer.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Wolf
I know. That's why I dropped Physics. But, sometimes, old memories come to my mind.
 
  • #10
Mr Wolf said:
I know. That's why I dropped Physics. But, sometimes, old memories come to my mind.

Perseverance counts for a lot :-p:-p:-p:-p:-p:-p:-p:-p

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Wolf
  • #11
Yeah, but it's the Math behind that discourages ...and too much Maths burns out the brain.o0)

Ok, later I'll open another thread. I'll try not to be too naive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K