MHB Percentage Change Logic Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter BossChloe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Logic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding percentage changes in rental fees after applying discounts. A rental fee of $100 in July with a 60% discount results in a payment of $40, while a 45% discount in August leads to a payment of $55. The confusion arises from the fact that the discount decreased by 15%, but the payment increased by 27%. This discrepancy is explained by the fact that percentage changes are relative to different base values, leading to different interpretations of the changes. The calculations clarify that the percentage increase in payment is based on the new amount paid, not the original discount percentage.
BossChloe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question regarding different percentage changes.

If I have a monthly rental fee of \$100 in July with a discount of 60%. I will pay \$40.

In the month of August the monthly rental fee is \$100 with a discount of 45%. I will pay \$55.

My discount has decreased by %15.

However my percentage increase of what I am paying is 27%. (\$55-\$40)/\$55 = 27%.

I don't quite understand how the percentage increase is 27% and not simply 15%. Could someone explain the logic?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's because you are comparing 15 to 2 different numbers. 15 is 15% of 100, however 15 is roughly 27% of 55. :)
 
First, let's recall some definitions. If a value equals $x_1$ at some point and $x_2$ at a later point, the actual change, denoted by $\Delta x$, is $x_2-x_1$. The relative change, which is often measured in percents and which I'll denote by $\delta x$, is $\dfrac{x_2-x_1}{x_1}=\dfrac{x_2}{x_1}-1$.

BossChloe said:
My discount has decreased by %15.
This phrase is ambiguous due to the fact that discount itself is measured in percents. Let $d_1=0.6$ and $d_2=0.45$; then indeed $\Delta d=-0.15$, but $\delta d=-0.25$.

BossChloe said:
However my percentage increase of what I am paying is 27%. (\$55-\$40)/\$55 = 27%.
As written above, the relative change is usually measured relative to the earlier value, so if the amounts payed are $p_1=40$ and $p_2=55$, then $\Delta p=15$ and $\delta p=0.375$.

BossChloe said:
I don't quite understand how the percentage increase is 27% and not simply 15%.
I don't think that $\delta p$ should equal $\delta d$. Let $t=100$ be the total rent. Then $p_i=t(1-d_i)$ for $i=1,2$. Therefore
\[
\Delta p=p_2-p_1=t(d_1-d_2)=t\Delta d
\]
but
\[
\delta p=\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1=\frac{1-d_2}{1-d_1}-1=\frac{d_1-d_2}{1-d_1}=\frac{\Delta d}{d_1-1}=\frac{\frac{d_2}{d_1}-1}{1-\frac{1}{d_1}}=\frac{\delta d}{1-\frac{1}{d_1}}.
\]
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top