MHB Percentage Change Logic Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter BossChloe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Logic
BossChloe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question regarding different percentage changes.

If I have a monthly rental fee of \$100 in July with a discount of 60%. I will pay \$40.

In the month of August the monthly rental fee is \$100 with a discount of 45%. I will pay \$55.

My discount has decreased by %15.

However my percentage increase of what I am paying is 27%. (\$55-\$40)/\$55 = 27%.

I don't quite understand how the percentage increase is 27% and not simply 15%. Could someone explain the logic?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's because you are comparing 15 to 2 different numbers. 15 is 15% of 100, however 15 is roughly 27% of 55. :)
 
First, let's recall some definitions. If a value equals $x_1$ at some point and $x_2$ at a later point, the actual change, denoted by $\Delta x$, is $x_2-x_1$. The relative change, which is often measured in percents and which I'll denote by $\delta x$, is $\dfrac{x_2-x_1}{x_1}=\dfrac{x_2}{x_1}-1$.

BossChloe said:
My discount has decreased by %15.
This phrase is ambiguous due to the fact that discount itself is measured in percents. Let $d_1=0.6$ and $d_2=0.45$; then indeed $\Delta d=-0.15$, but $\delta d=-0.25$.

BossChloe said:
However my percentage increase of what I am paying is 27%. (\$55-\$40)/\$55 = 27%.
As written above, the relative change is usually measured relative to the earlier value, so if the amounts payed are $p_1=40$ and $p_2=55$, then $\Delta p=15$ and $\delta p=0.375$.

BossChloe said:
I don't quite understand how the percentage increase is 27% and not simply 15%.
I don't think that $\delta p$ should equal $\delta d$. Let $t=100$ be the total rent. Then $p_i=t(1-d_i)$ for $i=1,2$. Therefore
\[
\Delta p=p_2-p_1=t(d_1-d_2)=t\Delta d
\]
but
\[
\delta p=\frac{p_2}{p_1}-1=\frac{1-d_2}{1-d_1}-1=\frac{d_1-d_2}{1-d_1}=\frac{\Delta d}{d_1-1}=\frac{\frac{d_2}{d_1}-1}{1-\frac{1}{d_1}}=\frac{\delta d}{1-\frac{1}{d_1}}.
\]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top