Perhaps they are all the same species

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
1) The most popular credence is that Homo

Erectus/Ergaster gave rise to Homo Heidelbergensis, which in turn is

the ancestor of the Neanderthal. However, each of the species I

mentioned, to me, appear pretty much the same. They all have weak

chins and brow ridges. Their face shape generally stays the same.

The only difference is an augmentation in brain size. Why are they

considered different species?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Calpalned said:
1) The most popular credence is that Homo

Erectus/Ergaster gave rise to Homo Heidelbergensis, which in turn is

the ancestor of the Neanderthal. However, each of the species I

mentioned, to me, appear pretty much the same. They all have weak

chins and brow ridges. Their face shape generally stays the same.

The only difference is an augmentation in brain size. Why are they

considered different species?
Well, Pygmies and Mongoloids appear pretty different to me. And yet they belong to the Homo sapiens species.
 
zoki85 said:
Well, Pygmies and Mongoloids appear pretty different to me. And yet they belong to the Homo sapiens species.
So it is clear that people who look quite different are grouped into the same species. But ironically, people who look similar (at least according to their skull and bone shape) like homo erectus, neanderthal, heidelbergensis, antecessor etc, are split up into different species. This is so odd.
 
Calpalned said:
So it is clear that people who look quite different are grouped into the same species. But ironically, people who look similar (at least according to their skull and bone shape) like homo erectus, neanderthal, heidelbergensis, antecessor etc, are split up into different species. This is so odd.
Let genome be fair judge here since eye can be misleading
 
I agree with zoki85. We might think whales were a type of big fish if we judge only by morphology, but whales descended from four legged land animals. What we have here is what's called "convergent evolution". Different species can evolve the same trait (in this case fins) independently.
 
Thank you zoki85 and Pythagorean