Periodic motion -- Potential as a function of a non-linear Force(x)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Please see the attached.I don't know how to do (ai).

potential function is the potential energy defined by f = -dV/dx
e is the total energy of the system where
e = KE + PE
= (dx/dt)^2 /2 + V

Note:m=1 because the particle has a unit mass
If you integrate f,you get V(the PE),which is -9/x + 18/x^2 :
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+-+9/x+++18/x^2

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I actually sketched the graph as given on the above website,clearly if e is positive then V must be negative,which is shown on the graph when x--->infinity,this is the answer to part (aii).But for a(i) I have no idea,because I haven't met a negative total mechanical energy before.
What I thought is:
KE + V = -e
KE is always positive,leaving V = -e-KE,
This means PE is always negative,but from (aii) I show that V is negative if x--->infinity.In fact,
V = -9/x + 18/x^2 = (18-9x) / x^2.

i.e. V<0 if x>2

If this is the case then in V = -e-Ke we need to have x>2 all the time,which doesn't make sense.Moreover this is the answer to (aii),e>0

Would greatly appreciate if someone can give me an idea what's going on

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • periodic motion.jpg
    periodic motion.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
For a given negative energy e<0, where can the particle be? Can it move to infinity? If not, how does its motion have to look like, e. g. if its initial motion is in positive x-direction?
davon806 said:
If this is the case then in V = -e-Ke we need to have x>2 all the time
True. Where is the problem?