Periodic Wave Solutions of the Wave Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the periodic wave solutions of the wave equation, specifically addressing the form f(x,t) = X(x)cos(wt). It is established that while periodic functions can be solutions, they must adhere to specific relationships between spatial and temporal periodicity, defined by w/k = v, where v is the wave speed. The wave equation in one dimension is given by ∂²f/∂x² - (1/v²)∂²f/∂t² = 0, leading to the conclusion that the general solution must take the form f(x,t) = [A sin(kx) + B cos(kx)]cos(ωt), with k = ω/v.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and their mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with harmonic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications in physics
  • Basic concepts of wave speed and its relationship to frequency and wavenumber
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the wave equation in different dimensions
  • Explore the properties of harmonic functions and their applications in wave mechanics
  • Learn about boundary conditions and their effects on wave solutions
  • Investigate the role of Fourier series in representing periodic functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on wave mechanics, applied mathematics, and engineering disciplines involving wave phenomena.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Every "spacially periodic" function [i.e. s.t there exist P s.t. f(x+P,t) = f(x,t)] of the form f(x,t) = X(x)cos(wt) is a solution of the wave equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
True...
 
quasar,

False.

For one thing, if f(x,t) is periodic (and it doesn't have to be periodic), then there's a strict relation between the periodicity in x and in t. In other words, in an example using your format, if f(x,t) = sin(kx)cos(wt), then w/k = v.

It's not too hard to see what the wave equation is saying about f(x,t) if you think about it. Within a multiplicative constant, the two partial derivatives are the same. That means f has to depend on x and t in very similar ways. I think the most general form for f(x,t) that satisfies the W.E. is f(kx-wt). Certainly any function of that form will work. Although that's not really what you were asking.
 
Uh oh!

James R., I posted before I saw yours. Why do you say it's true?
 
Hmm... Here are my thoughts. I think I might have changed my mind!

At first, I thought that any function of the form f(x,t) = X(x)cos wt will describe a standing wave, and so it is necessarily a solution of the wave equation.

But then...

The wave equation, in 1 dimension, is:

\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2} - \frac{\partial^2 f}{v^2 \partial t^2} = 0

where v is a constant (the wave speed).

Using the function given, we have:

\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2} = \frac{d^2 X}{dx^2}\cos \omega t
\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial t^2} = -\omega^2 X(x)\cos \omega t

Therefore, we require:

\frac{d^2 X}{dx^2} + \frac{X}{v^2} = 0

This restricts X(x) to harmonic functions of the form:

X(x) = A \sin kx + B \cos kx

where A and B are arbitrary constants, but k is restricted:

k=\omega / v

So, it seems that the most general functions of the given form which satisfy the wave equation are:

f(x,t) = [A \sin kx + B \cos kx]\cos \omega t

with the above restriction on k.

Does that seem right?
 
You don't you just work out the simplest case: f(x,t)=\cos(wt).
We clearly have f(x+P,t)=f(x,t) for any t (and any P).
The wave equation clearly doesn't hold in this case (unless \omega=0, but I understand \omega can be arbitrary).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K