MHB How to Find the Perpendicular Distance from a Point to a Line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perpendicular
AI Thread Summary
To find the perpendicular distance from point P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5, start by determining the equation of the line perpendicular to it, which has a slope of -2. Using the point-slope form, the equation of the perpendicular line is y = -2x + 5. To find the intersection of the two lines, set the equations equal: -2x + 5 = (x/2) - 5, and solve for x. Substitute the x-coordinate back into either line's equation to find the corresponding y-coordinate. This process will yield the intersection point needed to calculate the perpendicular distance.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Use the distance formula to find the perpendicular distance from P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5.

Any ideas on how to get started?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Use the distance formula to find the perpendicular distance from P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5.

Any ideas on how to get started?
Try starting with this.

-Dan
 
RTCNTC said:
Use the distance formula to find the perpendicular distance from P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5.

Any ideas on how to get started?

Perpendicular lines have gradients that multiply to give -1, so the gradient of the line you are looking for is -2. You know that (1, 3) lies on this line, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y - 3 &= -2 \left( x - 1 \right) \\ y - 3 &= -2\,x + 2\\ y &= -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$

And now you want to know where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = \frac{x}{2} - 5 \end{align*}$ intersect, so that you can work out the distance between this point and P(1, 3).
 
Prove It said:
Perpendicular lines have gradients that multiply to give -1, so the gradient of the line you are looking for is -2. You know that (1, 3) lies on this line, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y - 3 &= -2 \left( x - 1 \right) \\ y - 3 &= -2\,x + 2\\ y &= -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$

And now you want to know where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = \frac{x}{2} - 5 \end{align*}$ intersect, so that you can work out the distance between this point and P(1, 3).

To find where the two lines meet, do I set the equations equal to each other?
 
RTCNTC said:
To find where the two lines meet, do I set the equations equal to each other?

Yes, set:

$$-2x+5=\frac{x}{2}-5$$

and solve for $x$ to get the $x$-coordinate of the intersection point. Then plug this value for $x$ into either line (doesn't matter which as they will give the same $y$ value) to get the $y$-coordinate. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, set:

$$-2x+5=\frac{x}{2}-5$$

and solve for $x$ to get the $x$-coordinate of the intersection point. Then plug this value for $x$ into either line (doesn't matter which as they will give the same $y$ value) to get the $y$-coordinate. :D

I can do it. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top