Perpetual Motion From Satellite Revolution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical concept of harvesting energy from the revolution of satellites, specifically using the Moon as an example. Participants clarify that while extracting energy from an orbiting body is theoretically possible, it would result in a loss of altitude for that body over time, making perpetual motion impossible. The conversation highlights existing practices, such as tidal power, which already utilize energy from the Moon's gravitational effects. Ultimately, the consensus is that while energy extraction is feasible, it is not sustainable in the context of perpetual motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with tidal energy and its extraction methods
  • Basic knowledge of energy conservation principles
  • Awareness of the limitations of perpetual motion concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research tidal power generation techniques and their efficiency
  • Explore the physics of orbital mechanics and energy transfer
  • Investigate the implications of energy extraction on satellite orbits
  • Study the laws of thermodynamics as they relate to energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, energy researchers, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in the feasibility of energy extraction from celestial bodies.

LotoSage
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"Perpetual Motion" From Satellite Revolution

This is going to sound very far fetched, and I know very little about the laws of physics, admittedly (I don't even know if I'm posting this in the right area), but curiosity compels me.

I was wondering if it would be possible to harvest energy from the revolution of a nearby satellite as I've illustrated here: http://i.imgur.com/Z3u5i33.png

I use the moon as an example here, but that could be replaced with any nearby satellite. Would this work, in theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what your sketch is trying to show. However, it is the policy at PF not to discuss PM and the like.

In any event, if you try to extract energy from an orbiting body, you are going cause that body to lose altitude over time. After all, it takes a fixed amount of energy per unit mass to put something into a particular orbit, so while your scheme may be long-lived, it cannot be 'perpetual'.
 
Yeah, that's why I put it in quotes. While my understanding of physics is very limited I felt of course it couldn't last forever. I don't literally mean PM in this case (and that goes twicefold since it's disallowed), but simply a long term means of energy extraction. You seem to have gotten the right idea from my rudimentary illustration, and I thank you for your input.
 
LotoSage said:
I use the moon as an example here, but that could be replaced with any nearby satellite. Would this work, in theory?
We are already extracting that energy in practice:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power‎
 
We'd have to expend more energy putting the satellites into orbit than we'd get back, so there's no point.
 
LotoSage said:
I use the moon as an example here, but that could be replaced with any nearby satellite. Would this work, in theory?

It's all a matter of degree. The Moon is the largest object that will ever (could ever) be in orbit around the Earth. Any event that could introduce a comparable size of satellite would spell the end of the world for humans. Tidal surges or whaaaaat?

Tidal effects from the Moon (And the Sun, aamof) are many orders of magnitude greater than from anything else out there so those are the ones to go for. And we already do. From our point of view, the energy is 'inexhaustible' but it's not PM (verboten in PF).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
12K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K