Perpetual Motion using Brownian Motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of perpetual motion in relation to Brownian motion, exploring the implications of thermodynamics and the nature of energy. Participants examine whether Brownian motion can be harnessed for perpetual motion and the conditions under which it occurs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that perpetual motion is impossible due to the laws of thermodynamics.
  • One participant claims that Brownian motion continues indefinitely as long as the medium remains in equilibrium, but questions the ability to harness this energy.
  • Another participant suggests that the motion of all atoms is perpetual since absolute zero cannot be reached, implying a broader interpretation of perpetual motion.
  • A participant discusses the concept of "useful" energy in terms of entropy, noting that high-entropy energy requires a sink to be utilized effectively.
  • There is a mention that the random movement observed in Brownian motion does not violate thermodynamic principles, emphasizing energy conservation and entropy considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that perpetual motion is impossible according to thermodynamic laws, but there are competing views regarding the implications of Brownian motion and its potential for energy harnessing. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical applications of Brownian motion in the context of perpetual motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the conditions under which Brownian motion can be considered perpetual and the limitations of energy harnessing from such motion. There are also references to the adequacy of thermodynamics textbooks in explaining these concepts.

samsracecar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let me start off by saying that I very well know that PM is impossible. Thermodynamics aren't just good ideas-they're the law. :)

I have heard that Brownian Motion will go on infinitely, but you can't harness it and it is useless perpetual motion. Is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
samsracecar said:
Let me start off by saying that I very well know that PM is impossible. Thermodynamics aren't just good ideas-they're the law. :)

I have heard that Brownian Motion will go on infinitely, but you can't harness it and it is useless perpetual motion. Is this true?

I'm not sure where you heard this, Brownian motion will slow down as the medium cools I believe.
 
Ordinary Brownian motion will go on indefinitely as long as the medium is in equilibrium. There is no way to harness the energy, since that would be equivalent to cooling the medium.
 
Well, to be fair, the motion of all atoms in the universe is perpetual by that logic, since temperature can never reach 0K.
 
There is an objective measure of "useful" energy, which is entropy. Energy with high entropy can only be used if you have a sink for the excess entropy. For example, you can use thermal energy of a hot object, only if you have a colder object handy to be used as a sink.

Random movement of pollen particles observed by Brown is not a violation of thermodynamics, because a) total energy is conserved, and b) the motion of pollen has high entropy, same as motion of individual molecules in the medium that the pollen particles are floating in.

This isn't an issue of laws of physics being violated. But I agree, a lot of thermodynamics books do a poor job of explaining all this, so the point on examining textbooks is valid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
16K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K