Peskin and Schroeder p. 20-21

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Schroeder
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 6K views
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
8
In equation 2.23 we have
[tex]\phi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega}}(a + a^{\dagger})[/tex]

So how come equation 2.25 is

[tex]\phi(x) = \int{\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}}(a_pe^{ipx} + a_p^{\dagger}e^{-ipx})}[/tex]

And not [tex]\phi(x) = \int{\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}}(a_p + a_p^{\dagger})e^{ipx}}[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baba26
Physics news on Phys.org
because you have to account for the ground state of particle p at x.

"The" ground state is antisymmetric, not symmetric so your version won't allow for the phase (between ground state and evolved state).
 
The Fourier transform of a was substituted into both the a and the a dagger term, and the adjoint of a scalar times an operator is the conjugate of the scalar times the adjoint of the operator.

In other words, the Fourier transform has been applied to the basis states, not to phi(x) directly.
 
nicksauce said:
In equation 2.23 we have
[tex]\phi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega}}(a + a^{\dagger})[/tex]

So how come equation 2.25 is

[tex]\phi(x) = \int{\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}}(a_pe^{ipx} + a_p^{\dagger}e^{-ipx})}[/tex]

And not

[tex]\phi(x) = \int{\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}}(a_p + a_p^{\dagger})e^{ipx}}[/tex]

Isn't it because [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] is supposed to be a real field?
I.e., we want [itex]\phi(x)^\dagger = \phi(x)[/itex] .
 
The general solution of the classical KG equation is

[tex]\phi(x)=\int d^3p\left(g(\vec p)e^{i\sqrt{\vec p^2+m^2}-i\vec p\cdot\vec x}+h(\vec p)e^{i\sqrt{\vec p^2+m^2}+i\vec p\cdot\vec x}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\int d^3p\left(g(\vec p)e^{i\sqrt{\vec p^2+m^2}-i\vec p\cdot\vec x}+h(-\vec p)e^{i\sqrt{\vec p^2+m^2}-i\vec p\cdot\vec x}\right) =\int d^3p\left(g(\vec p)e^{ipx}+h(-\vec p)e^{-ipx}\right)[/tex]

where p0 is defined as the positive square root. What we get from the requirement that [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] be real is just that [itex]h(-\vec p)=g(\vec p)^*[/itex].