Peskin-Schroeder - Eqn 2.45 derivation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter giant_bog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
giant_bog
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems with the equations leading up to eqn 2.45 on page 25. The hamiltonian has a [itex](\nabla\phi)^2 + m^2 \phi^2[/itex] term in the [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] commutator and in the [itex]\pi(x)[/itex] commutator it's [itex]\phi(-\nabla^2 + m^2) \phi[/itex].

I'm aware of a vector calculus identity that makes [itex](\nabla\phi)^2 = 1/2 (\nabla^2[\phi^2]) - \phi \nabla^2 \phi[/itex].

That's almost what we have here, but the [itex]\frac{1}{2}(\nabla^2[\phi^2])[/itex] term is missing in the [itex]\pi(x)[/itex] commutator.

Did anybody see where it went?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the n-1 boundary term which is taken be zero.
 
You can do this kind of thing using integration by parts. E.g., in one dimension:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)^2 dx = \left[f(x) \frac{df}{dx}\right]_{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\frac{d^2 f}{dx^2}dx[/tex]

And if f(x) goes to zero at infinity then the first term on the right drops out.
 
I see it now. Thanks, folks.