Peskin and Schroeder - Derivation of equation (2.45)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving equation (2.45) from Peskin and Schroeder, specifically the expression involving the commutation relations of the fields π and φ. The key equation under scrutiny is ##i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\pi({\bf{x}},t) = -i(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x}},t)##. Participants suggest evaluating the second commutator by breaking it down into simpler components, specifically ##[\pi,m^2\phi] - [\pi,\nabla^2\phi]##, to facilitate the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly commutation relations.
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation and its components.
  • Knowledge of partial differential equations, specifically Laplacians and mass terms.
  • Proficiency in manipulating operator algebra in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation in detail.
  • Learn about commutation relations in quantum field theory, focusing on scalar fields.
  • Research techniques for evaluating commutators involving differential operators.
  • Explore the implications of the delta function in quantum mechanics and field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory and the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I'm having trouble deriving equation (2.45) on page 25. In particular, in the derivation of

##i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\pi({\bf{x}},t) = -i(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x}},t)##,

I need to show that

##\frac{1}{2}\pi({\bf{x}},t) \phi({\bf{x'}},t)(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t) - \frac{1}{2} \phi({\bf{x'}},t)(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2})\phi({\bf{x'}},t)\pi({\bf{x}},t) = -i \delta^{(3)}({\bf{x}}-{\bf{x'}})(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2})\phi({\bf{x'}},t)##.

Now, this is what I've done so far:

##\frac{1}{2}\pi({\bf{x}},t) \phi({\bf{x'}},t)(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t) - \frac{1}{2} \phi({\bf{x'}},t)(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2})\phi({\bf{x'}},t)\pi({\bf{x}},t)##

##=\frac{1}{2}\pi({\bf{x}},t) \phi({\bf{x'}},t)(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t)-\frac{1}{2}\phi({\bf{x'}},t)\pi({\bf{x}},t) (-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t) +\frac{1}{2}\phi({\bf{x'}},t)\pi({\bf{x}},t) (-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t)- \frac{1}{2} \phi({\bf{x'}},t)(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2})\phi({\bf{x'}},t)\pi({\bf{x}},t)##

##=\frac{1}{2}[\pi({{\bf{x}},t}), \phi({{\bf{x'}},t})](-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t) + \frac{1}{2}\phi({\bf{x'}},t)[\pi({\bf{x}},t), (-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t)]##

##=\frac{1}{2}(-i)\delta^{(3)}({\bf{x'}}-{\bf{x}})(-\nabla^{2}+m^{2}) \phi({\bf{x'}},t) + ??##.

How do I evaluate the second commutator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpp!
 
Did you try breaking the second commutator up as [\pi,m^2\phi] - [\pi,\nabla^2\phi] and convincing yourself that both the m^2 and \nabla^2 can be pulled out of their respective commutators?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
942
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K