Peskin-Schroeder - Eqn 2.45 derivation

  • Thread starter Thread starter giant_bog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
giant_bog
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems with the equations leading up to eqn 2.45 on page 25. The hamiltonian has a (\nabla\phi)^2 + m^2 \phi^2 term in the \phi(x) commutator and in the \pi(x) commutator it's \phi(-\nabla^2 + m^2) \phi.

I'm aware of a vector calculus identity that makes (\nabla\phi)^2 = 1/2 (\nabla^2[\phi^2]) - \phi \nabla^2 \phi.

That's almost what we have here, but the \frac{1}{2}(\nabla^2[\phi^2]) term is missing in the \pi(x) commutator.

Did anybody see where it went?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the n-1 boundary term which is taken be zero.
 
You can do this kind of thing using integration by parts. E.g., in one dimension:

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)^2 dx = \left[f(x) \frac{df}{dx}\right]_{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\frac{d^2 f}{dx^2}dx

And if f(x) goes to zero at infinity then the first term on the right drops out.
 
I see it now. Thanks, folks.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top