PF Photography: Tips, Tricks, & Photo Sharing

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
1,418 replies · 242K views
That is some mighty fine lighting Andre :smile:

I spent a couple of weeks in Scotland last month:

3798607350_f79090e50c.jpg


3798611278_caa48dc876.jpg


3756959851_837a73e26b.jpg


3757768052_afe3ce8bbd.jpg


3787672127_3fcb7358b3.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice work Matt, excellent.

So, after finding myself unable to satisfy a request of a sibling to make wide angle -real estate broker- interior pictures, I decided that I needed a wide angle lens.

So instead of going to the retailer I did some research and settled for a second hand, like new, etc, economical feasible Tokina 12-24mm for these reasons

So I wanted to compare it with the kit lens and I made this test shot with both lenses.

3162bf6.jpg


This messy rainforest is my front yard. I see if I can make something decent of it next year. The white rectangles are the crops below at 100%.

So I first processed the RAW shot, with only one click out of ten for sharpening and some trail and error work to take care of the Chromatic aberration. To the left is the camera processed jpg and to the right the result of the RAW processing and especially the fuchsia stems in the middle crop show some success dealing with the chromatic aberration.

2e4kr5x.jpg


A second shot almost similar was made with the kid lens with identical processing giving these results:

6fm7ip.jpg


Again, especially the fuchsias suggest that the Tokina wide angle lives up to its expectations.
 
That looks a pretty nice lens. I didn't consider it when I went for my ultra wide because I thought I'd miss the extra 2mm advantage the sigma had, but I'm finding 10mm is just too wide for most things I want to do with it.
 
chroot said:
matthyaouw,

Amazing work! How much work was done in post? My favorite is the second from last. :smile:

- Warren

Thanks! Most of them have just had a contrast & saturation tweak and a sharpen. The second to last had the sky darkened a tad. The last had some pretty strange colours because of the filters it was taken through so it had its white balance changed a whole load and the sky was partially desaturated.
 
sunset.jpg


I have several versions differing in the size of the white spot, can't decide which one is the best.
 
Beautiful pictures Andre, matthyaouw, and Borek!
 
Moths are cute

xbeg08.jpg


This is Behe :smile:

Or somewhat closer (60% crop)

2iloigi.jpg
 
Last edited:
Slightly different focus and some color processing

2qx6obd.jpg
 
Darn your macro hide, Andre! I have been looking for one for over a month, and nobody in the US has them. Everyone wants my credit card # to lock me in, but nobody can ship a lens. I don't play that game.
 
turbo-1 said:
Darn your macro hide, Andre! I have been looking for one for over a month, and nobody in the US has them. Everyone wants my credit card # to lock me in, but nobody can ship a lens. I don't play that game.

Sorry to hear, Turbo. I was looking around to see if I could assist. This is definitely true:

Here is a warning for anyone contemplating the purchase of the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Lens: You will find yourself looking for little things to use for subjects - which are everywhere. No bug is safe. You will find you neck hurting from looking down all the time. You will discover a world you never knew existed. Macro photography is great fun. And men - You now have another reason to buy your wife flowers (they make great subjects).
 
Thanks, Andre, though possible warranty issues and for-certain import duty issues make me want to buy from a US company. I'll just have to wait it out - meanwhile the nicest macro season (summer) is waning.
 
some 'against the light' pictures that somehow I did not select for the contest, because I thought the big sunset -although not my favorite- would be considered best

2lu6v6d.jpg


35lvo9f.jpg


2iqhc1x.jpg


2wh19qo.jpg


2d6pfdy.jpg


bjg6yh.jpg


oihf6h.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yesterday I have seen a friend of mine. It happened that in the last few years we have seen each other about once per year and only for a moment, so we have not exchanged much information. We have finally spent a few hours talking about everything that have happened in the meantime. He told me his 18 y.o. son is interested in photography and just got accepted to National Film School in Łódź (200 people interested, 7 places available). Then he gave me these links:

http://miachal.fotolog.pl

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11516102@N07/

There are moments when you want to throw the camera away and to stop thinking you ever knew how to take a simple picture.
 
True

Anyway, I browsed some old files and had forgotten about this capture of the dew in the cold morning

2s9p0cg.jpg
 
I have been waiting for the Canon 100mm macro to come off back-order. Canon has made no announcements, but it is funny that such a popular lens should be out of production for such a long time. That's got me thinking...is Canon re-designing that lens with Image Stabilization? It would be a really great move on their part.

Until that happens, maybe I should be happy with what I've got. I shot these today..the first one with the 28-135 at 135mm and the second with the 100-400 at 400mm. I used the on-board flash for the first, and natural lighting for the second.
cicada-1.jpg


cicada400mm.jpg
 
Last edited:
I started digging around, and this site has a Canon press release that claims that Canon's new hybrid IS system is a perfect match for macro lenses, in which high magnification also magnifies the blurring effects of shake and tilt. That would explain why the 100mm macro has been unavailable for months. My fear is that a new 100mm macro IS will also carry a red band (L designation) and jump several hundred dollars in price. Grrr!

http://www.canonrumors.com/
 
Link is not working - I mean, it displays only generic CanonRumors logo. Probably protection against hotlinking.
 
Borek said:
Link is not working - I mean, it displays only generic CanonRumors logo. Probably protection against hotlinking.
Oops! It showed for me after I checked the link, but that was because I had the image in my cache. It's a picture of a 100mm macro USM IS, with a red band, so it's been upgraded to L-series.
 
So here's your lens Turbo, officially announced: 100m f2.8 L with iS

But good news for your wallet:
The Canon EF 100mm F2.8L IS USM macro will supplement, rather than replace the existing 100mm F2.8 USM macro

Now all you need to do is convince yourself not to buy the nicer version. Good luck!

Canon have also announced the Eos 7D. This looks like a nice camera! The same size sensor as the 40d, 450d etc but with some of the perks of the 5d and its ilk.
 
I wonder if 7D CFx settings allow to remember - for example - +/-1 Tv bracketing with continuous shooting. This is a setting that I use now and then when it is hard to decide what exposition will be the best, but setting it requires a lot of tinkering; having it as an easily accessible preset would be a perfect solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyway, spent sometimes in the modest dutch forest and heather fields today to shoot ~200 pictures. I named this picture wow-heath.

ve0new.jpg


The species is Erica tetralix, but this specimen was the only one covered with those thick sticky water like bubbles.

Wow.

It was way too late for dew, I see that the leaves also possesses sticky, adhesive glands but this is weird.
 
Last edited:
Andre said:
Anyway, spent sometimes in the modest dutch forest and heath fields today to shoot ~200 pictures. I named this picture wow-heath.

The species is Erica tetralix, but this specimen was the only one covered with those thick sticky water like bubbles.

Wow.

It was way too late for dew, I see that the leaves also possesses sticky, adhesive glands but this is weird.
Any bugs caught in the sticky stuff? Around here, we have little plants called "sundews" that often live in nutrient-poor places like on rotting wood. They have sticky stuff on their leaves that looks tempting to insects. Bugs get stuck in the goo, and as they struggle to escape, the leaf folds around the bug, and as the bud dies, the plant absorbs its nutrients.
 
We have sundew as well, but no bugs here and lots of these flowers without the sticky stuff. It was close to this tree

35arbiw.jpg


Notice the boxes in the centre at the back. If you get real close it loox like this:

ohu5j9.jpg
 
Andre said:
We have sundew as well, but no bugs here and lots of these flowers without the sticky stuff. It was close to this tree

35arbiw.jpg


Notice the boxes in the centre at the back. If you get real close it loox like this:

ohu5j9.jpg

Ah, very nice...I bet it's a wonderful place for a bear to go on a long explore :smile:.
 

Similar threads

Are There Any Flickr Members Willing to Give Photography Tips to a Newbie?

  • fluidistic
  • · Replies 22 ·
  • General Discussion
Replies
22