PF Photography: Tips, Tricks, & Photo Sharing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around photography tips and sharing personal experiences with capturing images. Participants offer advice on hosting photos, suggesting platforms like ImageShack and emphasizing the importance of image size to maintain thread readability. Several users share their photos, including pets and wildlife, discussing composition, focus, and post-processing techniques. There is a focus on improving image quality through tools like GIMP for editing, with discussions about color balance and white balance settings to enhance photos. Users also exchange feedback on each other's work, highlighting the importance of constructive criticism for growth in photography skills. Additionally, there are mentions of joining photography groups for more in-depth critiques and learning opportunities. The conversation touches on the challenges of capturing wildlife and the technical aspects of photography, such as aperture settings and lens choices, while fostering a supportive community for beginners and experienced photographers alike.
  • #1,301
Maui said:
Shanghai from the highest observation deck in the world:

Maui, that shot made me dizzy!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,302
lisab said:
Maui, that shot made me dizzy!
Hold on, there's higher!

642u50.jpg
120x, hand shot

nnlgea.jpg
The moons of Jupiter(hand shot, no tripod):

w2q7p.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #1,303
8340593490_0148499618_c.jpg

here's a photo from the jersey shore after sandy tore it up.
 
  • #1,304
jqhjdk.jpg
 
  • #1,305
Finally- the first clear night in (what seems like) months. First image: 15/4, 8s @ ISO 800, background subtraction post-processing. Second image: 1:1 crop of 800/5.6, composite of 1/100s ISO100 and 1/4s ISO400.

http://imageshack.us/a/img191/6586/resultofdsc02785filtere.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img826/7623/dsc027793.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,306
Nice photos Andy! I'm curious, can you take such photos from a big city? I ask this because I'd think it's hard to see that many stars in the sky in a big city due to "light pollution".
Also for the second photo, you made a composite of "1/100s ISO100 and 1/4s ISO400". I am curious... shouldn't 1/100s ISO 100 be almost a fully dark photo?!
 
  • #1,307
fluidistic said:
Nice photos Andy! I'm curious, can you take such photos from a big city? I ask this because I'd think it's hard to see that many stars in the sky in a big city due to "light pollution".
Also for the second photo, you made a composite of "1/100s ISO100 and 1/4s ISO400". I am curious... shouldn't 1/100s ISO 100 be almost a fully dark photo?!

Thanks!

To the first question (light pollution): it's all about increasing the signal to noise ratio. What I did here was simply subtract the background- the slowly-varying intensity. Any location with a rapidly-varying intensity (starts, tree branches, etc) is left alone. It's easy to do- duplicate the image, blur one of them (I used a Gaussian blur radius of 100 pixels), and then subtract the blurred image from the original. Another method is 'image stacking', where multiple images are added together. There are lots of subtle details that go into optimizing a particular strategy, and there are folks here with a lot of experience who can help you.

As a point of reference, I have been able to consistently pull out magnitude +15 objects from the background. I think I can do even better once the weather warms up and I can spend more time outside.

To the second question, the answer is that I am using a lens with a large aperture; the lens is a 400/2.8 (with an optional 2x extension tube) which means for astrophotography it's a 6" refractor. This let's me use short shutter speeds, but more practically it let's me aim the camera by eye; I can 'star hop' to a particular faint object fairly quickly.
 
  • #1,308
Andy Resnick said:
To the first question (light pollution): it's all about increasing the signal to noise ratio. What I did here was simply subtract the background- the slowly-varying intensity. Any location with a rapidly-varying intensity (starts, tree branches, etc) is left alone. It's easy to do- duplicate the image, blur one of them (I used a Gaussian blur radius of 100 pixels), and then subtract the blurred image from the original. Another method is 'image stacking', where multiple images are added together. There are lots of subtle details that go into optimizing a particular strategy, and there are folks here with a lot of experience who can help you.

I'm assuming that the background subtraction doesn't actually increase the SN ratio, it just removes the background light from the sky without affecting the abrupt changes where something blocks out the background light, such as the tree limbs you mentioned, along with the sudden increase in signal from stars? That way you can still see the tree limbs and such, thanks to the "glow" around them, and at the same time you can see the stars as well.
 
  • #1,309
Thanks Andy for the explanation.
 
  • #1,310
Drakkith said:
I'm assuming that the background subtraction doesn't actually increase the SN ratio, it just removes the background light from the sky without affecting the abrupt changes where something blocks out the background light, such as the tree limbs you mentioned, along with the sudden increase in signal from stars? That way you can still see the tree limbs and such, thanks to the "glow" around them, and at the same time you can see the stars as well.

That's a good point. My intention was to describe ways to stretch the contrast between star and sky.
 
  • #1,311
Andy Resnick said:
That's a good point. My intention was to describe ways to stretch the contrast between star and sky.

Got it.
 
  • #1,312
Spring is in my backyard. Definitely.

Pelobates_fuscus.jpg
 
  • #1,313
Have you seen this video borek?
:biggrin:
By the way, nice photo. Do you know whether it's a toad or a frog? Probably the former...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,314
fluidistic said:
Have you seen this video borek?
:biggrin:


Sigh. I thought I already know what it is about and then... Now I have coffee everywhere.

By the way, nice photo. Do you know whether it's a toad or a frog? Probably the former...

Check the file name.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,315
Borek said:
Sigh. I thought I already know what it is about and then... Now I have coffee everywhere.
lol.

Borek said:
Check the file name.
Ah, I didn't know that was possible. Nice... According to wiki:
Wiki the Great said:
When alarmed, it emits a very loud call (alarm call) and it can exude a noxious secretion which smells like garlic, hence the common name "garlic toad".
. So your specimen was around 6 to 8 cm?!
 
  • #1,316
fluidistic said:
So your specimen was around 6 to 8 cm?!

Perhaps even larger.
 
  • #1,317
Borek said:
Perhaps even larger.

Nice :)
 
  • #1,318
Wow, that must be Touchwood from Catweazle

http://www.nostalgie.webpark.cz/wp-content/gallery/caryfuk/cf9.jpg

http://www.nostalgie.webpark.cz/caryfuk-1970-catweazle
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,319
This is a chip from the paleolithic era: a circa-1968 RCA CD4012 (dual 4-input NAND gate) device.

http://imageshack.us/a/img835/803/dsc05788i.jpg

I've found a stash of TTL devices (and a lot more) dating from 1962 (!), I will be posting images of these on my lab blog as they become available.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,320
M57, the Ring Nebula, is currently in the small patch of sky visible from my backyard:


A 1:1 crop


technical: stack of 800/5.6, 20s, ISO 2000 frames
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,321
just a picture i took randomly during a car ride. no preperation at all just with a camera on my phone :) though it looked rather nice.
 

Attachments

  • 1376752776015.jpg
    1376752776015.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 407
  • #1,322
A photo montage of a recent ISS flyover. Tech: 800/5.6, 1/1600s ISO800. Maximum elevation angle was 60 degrees, and there is no motion blur.



It looks much cooler as an animated GIF, tho...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,323
That's awesome Andy!
 
  • #1,324
Drakkith said:
That's awesome Andy!

Thanks!
 
  • #1,325
The constellation Cygnus is in a favorable position now, and I took some interesting images of the galactic plane using my normal and wide-angle lenses- here are 100% crops.

http://imageshack.us/a/img841/6418/y4ll.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img9/7271/sv2w.jpg

Here's a crop using the telephoto for comparision:

http://imageshack.us/a/img46/5808/3dmm.jpg

Shameless self-promotion: full images and analysis on our lab blog.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,326
Beautiful, Andy - I especially like the second one, it's so sparkly.

Afraid I don't have enough imagination to see the goose though :redface:.
 
  • #1,327
Nice, Andy.
 
  • #1,328
Just some photos I took...
u4y4a8yq.jpg

uhyvezet.jpg

edamujam.jpg
 
  • #1,329
Beautiful ABD EL HAMEED. I don't know, but I would like to do captions for these photos;

3rd photo: One afternoon in the Middle East.
2nd photo: The sun is back.
1st: Shine on you crazy diamond. :biggrin:
 
  • #1,330
Gad said:
Beautiful ABD EL HAMEED. I don't know, but I would like to do captions for these photos;

3rd photo: One afternoon in the Middle East.
2nd photo: The sun is back.
1st: Shine on you crazy diamond. :biggrin:

Thanks,but it was the sunset in the 2nd picture so I think it should be called "fare away sun" or something like that :p
 
  • #1,331
Pardon my intrusion.
ABD EL HAMEED said:
The Lofty Diamond
u4y4a8yq.jpg

The Last Flash
uhyvezet.jpg

An afternoon in the Middle East
edamujam.jpg


Or perhaps the third could be called 'The Eye Of Egypt'
 
  • #1,332
lisab said:
Beautiful, Andy - I especially like the second one, it's so sparkly.

Afraid I don't have enough imagination to see the goose though :redface:.

Drakkith said:
Nice, Andy.

Thanks, guys. You can't see the constellation because it greatly overfills the frame using either the 85mm or 400mm; the brightest star in the 15mm is Deneb. The 400mm shows NGC 6910 while the 85mm is near HD 193702.
 
  • #1,333
Enigman said:
Pardon my intrusion.Or perhaps the third could be called 'The Eye Of Egypt'

Ya you're right it would be awesome
Here's another one I took in a road trip I just came back from
8asenuja.jpg
 
  • #1,334
*inhales the air of that place*
 
  • #1,335
Gad said:
*inhales the air of that place*

Ya nothing's better than clean,fresh and cool sunset air
If only I had a better camera than my galaxy s2's...
I feel like there's lots of noise in the picture when I zoom in
 
  • #1,336
Looking for a sunset?

sunset_Stari_Grad.jpg
 
  • #1,337
It's humid and smells fishy out there, Borek. :biggrin:

Nonetheless, it's eye pleasant. :)
 
  • #1,338
Borek said:
Looking for a sunset?

sunset_Stari_Grad.jpg

It looks beautiful

Gad said:
It's humid and smells fishy out there, Borek. :biggrin:

Nonetheless, it's eye pleasant. :)

Where was it taken?
 
  • #1,339
ABD EL HAMEED said:
Where was it taken?

I don't know, close by the sea? :biggrin: :wink:
 
  • #1,340
Gad said:
I don't know, close by the sea? :biggrin: :wink:

Kinda figured that part out :rolleyes:
 
  • #1,341
Check the file name.
 
  • #1,342
Another view of the ocean. Life was tough for me last week. :-p

OnTheBeachAtHalfMoonCay.jpg
 
  • #1,343
Dang, I would far sooner be there than here at the " salt mine"

turn off the phone and the computer ... pass me a Pina Colada and let me relax :smile:Dave
 
  • #1,344
Return to the Blue Lagoon xD
 
  • #1,345
Borg said:
Another view of the ocean. Life was tough for me last week. :-p

OnTheBeachAtHalfMoonCay.jpg

Lol I'm sure it was...:p
 
  • #1,346
Borg said:
Another view of the ocean. Life was tough for me last week. :-p

Nice! jealous = me.
 
  • #1,347
lisab said:
Beautiful, Andy - I especially like the second one, it's so sparkly.

Afraid I don't have enough imagination to see the goose though :redface:.

<honk, honk>
http://imageshack.us/a/img18/3011/ycrf.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,348
Andy Resnick said:
<honk, honk>
http://imageshack.us/a/img18/3011/ycrf.jpg
Taking pictures like this makes me jealous. Another fine shot Andy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,350
On Saturday I went biking - and saw these people:

EMT_training1.jpg


EMT_training2.jpg


Nothing extraordinary, but berkeman was on the EMT shift during SWAT competition, or he was training as a part of this competition, or he was doing both at the same time - so it was hard to not think about him :smile:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top