PF Photography: Tips, Tricks, & Photo Sharing

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around photography tips and sharing personal experiences with capturing images. Participants offer advice on hosting photos, suggesting platforms like ImageShack and emphasizing the importance of image size to maintain thread readability. Several users share their photos, including pets and wildlife, discussing composition, focus, and post-processing techniques. There is a focus on improving image quality through tools like GIMP for editing, with discussions about color balance and white balance settings to enhance photos. Users also exchange feedback on each other's work, highlighting the importance of constructive criticism for growth in photography skills. Additionally, there are mentions of joining photography groups for more in-depth critiques and learning opportunities. The conversation touches on the challenges of capturing wildlife and the technical aspects of photography, such as aperture settings and lens choices, while fostering a supportive community for beginners and experienced photographers alike.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #782
So Turbo, will you ever dust off the Canons again?

Anyway I was walking with the junior today, looking for 'perspective' when we passed swan lake.

23j22rk.jpg


a juvenile one in unusual perspective.

241w68p.jpg
 
  • #783
So I was sitting outside having a smoke break at work, and just out of curiosity I took this pic:

1r3mvc.jpg


with my Nokia 6650 phone. Thought it turned out pretty good so I figured I'd post it up here.
 
  • #784
Andre said:
Anyway I was walking with the junior today, looking for 'perspective' when we passed swan lake.

Who took the pictures - you, or Junior?
 
  • #785
Andre said:
So Turbo, will you ever dust off the Canons again?
I certainly will, especially in controlled environments or when my wife is available to keep track of the new dog.. I'm busy training Duke and trying to make him safe around roads, etc, so most of my current photo-opportunities are more appropriate for the pocket camera. It's a handy little package, and I can shoot lots of stuff automatically with just one hand.

Going out with Duke, a training aid or two, a 30-foot training lead, treats, etc, doesn't leave a lot of spare resources to handle DSLRs with manually-zoomed lenses. Maybe if I had an extra hand or two.
 
  • #786
Borek said:
Who took the pictures - you, or Junior?

Must have been junior, considered the frog perspective. At least the neck strap got soaking wet.

He also took this pic at the other extreme, about 13 mm wide angle, practicing 'perspective' shots on the same swan

2r2pqif.jpg


Right Turbo, I'm happy to drag all the stuff around and switch lenses frequently, shooting always in RAW, just to get the highest possible quality on the big prints

Nice job, Kronos
 
  • #787
Kronos5253 said:
with my Nokia 6650 phone

Just wow.

That's probably the first time I see picture taken with mobile and I like it (meaning technical side). So far everything I have seen was crappy, unles it was in an ad :wink: Could be subject helped.
 
  • #788
Well, my first bird in my garden shot, a blue tit:

b7i904.jpg


but it was a though one, the light was bad deep down in the shrub; From the exif:

Shooting Mode... Program AE
Tv( Shutter Speed )... 1/100
Av( Aperture Value )... 5.0
Metering Mode... Evaluative Metering
Exposure Compensation... 0
ISO Speed... 800
Lens... EF70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Focal Length... 165.0mm

and the window was refecting a lot, as you can see on the unprocessed jpeg output of the full shot:

ok3j3d.jpg
 
  • #789
Borek said:
Just wow.

That's probably the first time I see picture taken with mobile and I like it (meaning technical side). So far everything I have seen was crappy, unles it was in an ad :wink: Could be subject helped.


Thanks :) I appreciate it!

I have a bunch more that I want to put up on here, I just haven't switched them to the computer yet
 
  • #790
I took Duke to the scenic lookout to exercise and walk a bit, and in between his unplanned visits to every rock and tree, I managed to snap off a shot of Sugarloaf. Winter is here - at least in the higher elevations. There was a picture in todays paper of some Sugarloaf employees riding a Snow-Cat on their way back from tending to snow-making equipment.

Noting the softness, I should have been using a tripod, but that's just too much extra gear to lug. I have a hiking staff with a 1/4"x24 stud under the knob, so maybe next time, I'll at least take that and have a monopod for support.

sugarloaf10_14.jpg
 
  • #791
Hmmm maybe more a focussing problem Turbo? Check the tree low corner left, appears sharper than the background.
 
  • #792
Andre said:
Hmmm maybe more a focussing problem Turbo? Check the tree low corner left, appears sharper than the background.
Could be. Next time I'm up there, I'll compare hand-held with monopod-mounted, in Auto, Custom, and Scene(landscape) modes to see what's up. This camera (at least in iA mode) fires a burst of flash as a focusing aid, and perhaps that foreground tree caught enough of it to sway the autofocus to the foreground.
 
  • #793
I find myself focussing manually more and more. In a burst sequence for a more or less static subject like grandson babies for instance, there is no need for distracting in between focussing. Also working with wide angle to optimize depth of field, as well as macro tripod work when quick reaction is not a factor.
 
  • #794
Interesting. We bought in June second hand (but barely used) A590 for bike trips - and this is uncropped zoom:

a590_zoom.jpg


and same picture, not cropped, just resized:

a590_zoom1.jpg


To some extent similar lack of sharpness.

I forgot to reserach it in more details, could be that happens only on the long end when taking pictures that need DOF. Most pictures were taken in just a landscape mode, and they were reasonably good and sharp:

a590_ferry.jpg


a590_sieniawa.jpg


At least they are much better than no pictures from bike trips at all :wink:
 
  • #795
Interesting, Borek. I hope the ZS3 performs better than that at full telephoto, and it's just a matter of user-error. Certainly, normal and macro shots are top-notch with this little pocket-cam.
 
  • #796
Borek said:
Interesting. We bought in June second hand (but barely used) A590 for bike trips - and this is uncropped zoom:

a590_zoom.jpg


That looks really awesome zoomed and cropped like that. Makes it look kind of like an old oil painting.. It's a pretty cool effect
 
  • #797
Here are the few more that I said I took with my Nokia 6650 phone :)

2s99d92.jpg


11bhlk2.jpg


2a9vdi1.jpg

I have another version of this taken with my Nikon coolpix.. I'll post that up when I get home, the quality is 10x better

I took two of these.. One with the auto setting on the phone, one on the "sunny" setting

This is auto
kpzcz.jpg


This is the "sunny" setting
bilav5.jpg



If you can't tell I like taking pictures of the sky haha
 
  • #798
Kronos, that phone has a pretty decent camera function, and at least you'll always have it with you so you can snap off a shot anytime.
 
  • #799
turbo-1 said:
Kronos, that phone has a pretty decent camera function, and at least you'll always have it with you so you can snap off a shot anytime.

Ya that's what I love about it :D The quality is alright.. It's grainy though. If I would have posted the full size pics you would see the colored grains in it. It's actually only a 2MP camera haha I just like to think that I'm pretty good with a camera
 
  • #800
Nice work Kronos, composition ideas are great but you notice the hardware limitations indeed.

Next shots in one session ware made with a EOS 450D with a Tokina 12-24mm wide angle zoom, mostly at 12mm wide in the hunt for the photo contest perspective, all but one are on 18% of the real size, with some crops on the original 100% size, so you can judge if you can settle for a camera phone or if you need heavier hardware.

30w9r48.jpg


crop on 100% of the standard jpg output.

55gwhv.jpg


Same crop from a RAW image after some processing, sharpening, reducing noise reduction, and some more image tuning

167w9iv.jpg


and the uncropped frame again on 18% after RAW processing, obviously the changes will be more clear on a poster of 24 inch.

5eehl2.jpg


Some more unprocessed JGP's:

2me7ts3.jpg


2us9bg0.jpg


mwa6ti.jpg


(this one was cropped to remove some nasty signs)

1zyhs2r.jpg


23jjvr6.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #801
Andre said:
Nice work Kronos, composition ideas are great but you notice the hardware limitations indeed.

Next shots in one session ware made with a EOS 450D with a Tokina 12-24mm wide angle zoom, mostly at 12mm wide in the hunt for the photo contest perspective, all but one are on 18% of the real size, with some crops on the original 100% size, so you can judge if you can settle for a camera phone or if you need heavier hardware.

30w9r48.jpg


crop on 100% of the standard jpg output.

55gwhv.jpg


Same crop from a RAW image after some processing, sharpening, reducing noise reduction, and some more image tuning

167w9iv.jpg


and the uncropped frame again on 18% after RAW processing, obviously the changes will be more clear on a poster of 24 inch.

5eehl2.jpg


Some more unprocessed JGP's:

2me7ts3.jpg


2us9bg0.jpg


mwa6ti.jpg


(this one was cropped to remove some nasty signs)

1zyhs2r.jpg


23jjvr6.jpg

Oh I'd love to have a better piece of equipment rather then use a phone.. But I be poor haha My wife is big into photography and she wants a nikon D90, but we don't exactly have the spare cash for that haha The Nikon Coolpix actually takes really decent pictures though, but I'd much rather have, say, my dad's 35mm manual focus. It's like, 20-30 years old, but it takes BEAUTIFUL pictures. Someday I'll inherit it.. Some day. But for now I guess I'll just have to stick to my phone or the Coolpix.

Those are great pictures though... I think I would have used the under the tree picture (5th one down) for the perspective shot. I like the angles and the way the line for the water passes through the picture.
 
  • #802
Right the fifth one down was on the short list as were all these. However maybe a bit too artifical looking. Suspicious persons could think of photoshopping. I almost went for #1 but that was maybe too dull. So I thought that the one I selected had the most extreme perspective.

Anyway, nice to have a hardware dream. I do too, it's called Canon EOS 7D, but there is also something like rational acceptance factors. The Nikon D90 is a fine piece. Just keep an eye on the sales market. It's prices will come down as new hardware floods the market.
 
  • #803
Andre said:
Right the fifth one down was on the short list as were all these. However maybe a bit too artifical looking. Suspicious persons could think of photoshopping. I almost went for #1 but that was maybe too dull. So I thought that the one I selected had the most extreme perspective.

True true, and I agree, the last one has the most extreme perspective. Makes the building look way bigger than it is, and the cannon adds a nice touch to the line of sight :D

Andre said:
Anyway, nice to have a hardware dream. I do too, it's called Canon EOS 7D, but there is also something like rational acceptance factors. The Nikon D90 is a fine piece. Just keep an eye on the sales market. It's prices will come down as new hardware floods the market.

Of course, good advice, and dually noted :) The one you posted is the one I'm looking to get, but my wife adores the D90 lol She likes the way it fits in her hand. Prices are a bit much, but it'll happen soon enough.
 
  • #804
A friend of mine got a Canon PowerShot SX20 IS for Christmas. Apparently it takes pictures on the macro setting, but she can't figure out how it works. (This camera is more automatic and less manual.) Anyone here familiar with the camera and have any hints and/or tips for taking amazing bug shots like Andre and Turbo and Borek do?
 
  • #805
Hi, Georgina. It's my understanding that the manual shipped with that camera is a truncated version (though it ought to have SOME instructions for putting the rig in macro mode) and you have to go on-line and download the remainder of the manual. In a review, I read that the manual in the box is more like a "getting started" guide, still there ought to be an intuitive way to get to macro mode. Often, there are quick menu options, and "macro" will often be signified by a symbol that looks like the silhouette of a tulip. My Panasonic DMC-ZS3 is a bit too automatic, too, but it has pretty decent macro performance. I bought it because walking a rambunctious young (and incredibly strong) dog several times a day has cut into my DSLR forays, and I needed a pocket camera.

penny.jpg
 
  • #806
I am not familiar with operating that camera, but I assume that it could be similar to other superzooms like the Panasonic FZ18 - FZ28 etc. As far as I know these camera's only have macro capability in the wide angle range and that is not very encouraging.

So what I did for my FZ-18, I bought a dedicated converter tube and a set of macro (close up) lenses to fit on that camera and then the possibilities are awesome, allowing a good distance between subject and camera, so not to disturb them

Some result:

hstglh.jpg

b8vlop.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #808
Andre said:
So what I did for my FZ-18, I bought a dedicated converter tube and a set of macro (close up) lenses to fit on that camera and then the possibilities are awesome, allowing a good distance between subject and camera, so not to disturb them

Here is that setof tubes and a close up lens with the Panasonic (bridge) camera, which is roughly the same idea as the SX-20

2jciuqw.jpg


and assembled here:

10yp53r.jpg


And this image was taken with that combination, hand held with only light from the monitor from a distance of almost 2 feet / 50 cm (picture size reduced to 20%)

e12otf.jpg


Althought the image quality is definitely less than the Canon 100mm macro lens, it's still the most versatile option to hunt bugs in a dynamic environment -without tripod. Also the lack of image quality is compensated by an effective anti vibration system and a much better depth of field in the macro range.
 
Last edited:
  • #809
Hey, here are some pictures I've taken.

3864916244_12f666b1b5.jpg


3720110482_67a42b8571.jpg


3720107984_88ffda3a1c.jpg


3719295845_cd01e9382e.jpg


3720110804_95cb29bc48.jpg


3720108172_f0a5ab472c.jpg


4313508273_73475c5ef5.jpg


4300704354_62b0b6a6d8.jpg


You can click on them for (slightly) bigger versions.
 
  • #810
Vasara said:
Hey, here are some pictures I've taken.

Very nice, Vasara :smile:.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K