PF Style 2026

  • Context: Announcement 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
166 replies · 7K views
QuarkyMeson said:
If that all makes sense. Again, just one mans opinion.
It does and we will likely moderate in the near future. For now, we're not standing on our own very well. Chat search has greatly harmed participation, so we must make it very clear what our differentiation is and value prop.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy
Physics news on Phys.org
#151, QuarkyMeson
The post still seems unfocused but in trying to interpret, I feel like you and I and hopefully others want the forum structure to be more easily found, and want actual members participating. Such as I try to interpret make sense.
 
Reply
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: QuarkyMeson
I wanted to get a few days experience before forming an opinion. I use primarily the dark mode on a mobile device, and I really like the new UI. I like the organization of the front page and feel like it encourages my activity in forums that I typically don’t visit.
 
Reply
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
The main page when logged-in has two main columns, not rows. Not able to remember exactly which section of the forums are where, and not remember the names of each of those sections, needing to scroll up and down several times to see what is where. Also all that partly duplicated stuff at the top before the main sections of the forum. So much scrolling up and down. What was in the past, the forum had one main set of sections (all in one main column) and to reach each of them, we only needed to scroll downward, mostly.

edit: for slightly more clarity, when the forum sections begin, we find the heading called Browse by Field. We must scroll down to see it. Then in that area or region we find two column, instead of one column, so to reach the subsection or sections, we may often need to scroll up and down a few times.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
I believe this one was said before, but in light mode, trying to highlight a section of text gives a background highlight coloration which looks too much like the non-highlighted background. So light it is that I do not know if text is or is not being highlighted. That is one of the first things needing to be adjusted for. I was attempting to highlight a comma so I could then turn it (and actually 'them') into bold; but I saw no indication of highlight taken place - because I could not see it.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
PF style 2026 has been released. It's a warmer, more modern and academic theme. Please thread in your feedback and suggestions. I'll be making numerous tweaks over the coming weeks. We have a dark style to try out. If you select system in the mode selector it will sync with your system settings for dark/light. If you prefer the old style, you are welcome to continue using it till the end of the year by using the style selector at the bottom left of the footer. I've been enjoying using the new style over the past week. I hope you do too!

View attachment 372988

View attachment 372989
This is a good view currently.
 
I will use that link bottom left (footer) where you say, and set myself to see the older style. Hopes be able to switch back to the new style too.

edit: I'm not sure that the style changed.
edit: Nope. Did not change. Not seemed to let me choose.
 
symbolipoint said:
I will use that link bottom left (footer) where you say, and set myself to see the older style. Hopes be able to switch back to the new style too.

edit: I'm not sure that the style changed.
edit: Nope. Did not change. Not seemed to let me choose.
I figured this out. The link gives two choices in the bottom displayed row. Top row only says 'default...'. The bottom row shows TWO choices: Physics Forums; and Physics Forums 2026. Upon choosing "Physics Forums", the style gives me the previous appearance and arrangement.
 
I am still in the 2025 & earlier Style. I complained briefly a few posts ago about inability to clearly see highlighting when in "light" style of the PF 2026 style. What I find using the earlier style/2025, is that when I highlight some text, the text becomes white and the background of the highlighting becomes a medium blue. That arrangement makes the highlighting easy to see.
 
I'm not a fan, because it looks vibe coded and the slogans that market the human side of the site look AI generated.
 
Reply
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and sbrothy
atp_ent said:
I'm not a fan, because it looks vibe coded and the slogans that market the human side of the site look AI generated.

This one is in reply to another "topic", as you can see. But this is how I feel by vibe coding! :smile:
 
In dark mode, the log-in button isn't accessible (in terms of color contrast).

Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 12.22.25 PM.webp
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and Dale
symbolipoint said:
SiennaTheGr8
How did you do that (post #162)? Must be a way to put the forum in Dark Mode through the computer because seems to be cannot change display mode until member OR user or visitor signs into Physicsforums.
On mobile I’m defaulted into dark mode.
 
SiennaTheGr8 said:
In dark mode, the log-in button isn't accessible (in terms of color contrast).

View attachment 373130
He's right! The "Log in" button is difficult to read in Dark mode; but it is active and it can be used to bring up the log-in form. (I checked this using mobile Android device.) Readability needs to be adjusted or changed if possible.
 
symbolipoint said:
He's right!

Always!
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint