- #1
- 19,407
- 9,949
Please use this thread to report errors and functional problems. Please don't post about preferences, likes, dislikes etc. Please keep in mind I am still working on a lot of things. Thanks!
The count is unread just like beforesymbolipoint said:There were a few counts of something on top of a bell icon but when I opened that, there were many many posts listed, while the number over the bell icon showed "4".
Did it just get sent now?fresh_42 said:the Newsletter still lists all under "General Physics" which creates the impression we have no other forums.
No, the last one, last Tuesday. I just thought this thread here would turn into a list for you, so I thought I add it.Greg Bernhardt said:Did it just get sent now?
For mobile I need to configure, should be gone in the next few days.Wrichik Basu said:Did you start ads for members as well? I can see some ads even when logged in.
Hover over the "Like" link in a post.cnh1995 said:I saw that the previous "Like count" has now become "reaction score". Does this mean there will be other reactions available as well?
PS: PF5 is very cool!
How do you do that from mobile?Greg Bernhardt said:Hover over the "Like" link in a post.
What happens when you press and hold?Wrichik Basu said:How do you do that from mobile?
Done. Thanks.Greg Bernhardt said:What happens when you press and hold?
This was worked on, can you check if better now?The Bill said:On a 1536×2048 portrait oriented tablet screen, when viewing the desktop version of the site the main page is crunched to one side like this:
undefined
Yes, the layout in desktop mode looks proportional now. Thanks.Greg Bernhardt said:This was worked on, can you check if better now?
weird, it should not collapse to single column until 900px. what tablet are you using?The Bill said:Not to mention that the single column view just looks out of place on a 1536 pixel wide 8" display. It makes me have to move my fingers way too much, to the point that I can imagine it being an accessibility issue for some tablet users.
Greg Bernhardt said:weird, it should not collapse to single column until 900px. what tablet are you using?
whoops! that was a big oversight! :DBvU said:Homework template missing in Intro Phys HW. Oversight or intention ?
hmmm that is a wordpress plugin I use to do that automatically. It should link, I'll have to investigate.Ygggdrasil said:The PhysicsForums twitter account often tweets about posts on the forum without actually including a link to the post discussed
I'm rebuilding the thumbnails now, hopefully that helps.Wrichik Basu said:Some thumbnails for videos in the media gallery are not visible. One is on the home page itself.
Still unsatisfactory: Currently one cannot get a complete preview: title, problem statement and relevant equations are missing. Unpractical if they contain lots of ##\LaTeX##Greg Bernhardt said:whoops! that was a big oversight! :D
Are you referring to the quick thread within the thread list?BvU said:Still unsatisfactory: Currently one cannot get a complete preview: title, problem statement and relevant equations are missing. Unpractical if they contain lots of ##\LaTeX##
I'm not sure I understand your issue. That the label was replaced by an icon or that hover has been replaced by a click?BvU said:A feature that begins to irritate: 'alerts' was replaced by an alarm bell that has to be clicked to see the list.
BvU said:Click and the counter is gone altogether.
No. To the intro phys HW forum. When I click on 'post thread'Greg Bernhardt said:Are you referring to the quick thread within the thread list?
ConfirmedBvU said:No. To the intro phys HW forum. When I click on 'post thread'
the latter but I think I once complained about ALL entries reacting to a passing mouse pointerGreg Bernhardt said:I'm not sure I understand your issue. That the label was replaced by an icon or that hover has been replaced by a click?
When I wake up and I have ten or more of them, a) the clicking and waiting for a response to see them begins to annoy, b) it's very hard to keep track of which ones I looked at and which ones will have to wait until I'm at work -- or back homeThat is by design. It's a counter for how many alerts are unread. Once you click, are you not reading the alerts?
PF5 stands for "Problems & Errors: Report & Discuss" and it is a process used in scientific research to identify and address issues that may arise during experiments or data analysis. It is important to report and discuss these problems and errors in order to maintain the integrity and accuracy of scientific findings.
Some common problems and errors that may occur in scientific research include equipment malfunctions, human error, biased data, and insufficient sample sizes. These can lead to inaccurate results and conclusions if not addressed and corrected.
By reporting and discussing problems and errors, scientists can identify and correct any issues that may affect the accuracy of their research. This can lead to more reliable and valid results, ultimately improving the overall quality of scientific research.
The process for reporting and discussing problems and errors may vary depending on the specific research project and team. However, it typically involves documenting the issue, discussing it with other researchers or colleagues, and implementing a solution or making necessary adjustments to the research methods.
There are several steps scientists can take to prevent problems and errors from occurring in their research. These include carefully planning and designing experiments, using reliable and calibrated equipment, double-checking data and calculations, and having a thorough understanding of the scientific methods being used.