Phase-Lock-Loop vs Injection Locking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fischer777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Injection
Click For Summary
Phase-Lock-Loops (PLLs) are preferred over injection locking for synchronizing signals to oscillators due to their ability to maintain a well-defined integer ratio of harmonics, providing predictable frequency control. Injection locking can be simpler but lacks the precise control over harmonic ratios, making it less reliable in practical applications. The difficulty in controlling the p/q ratio in injection locking can lead to unpredictability, especially when drift is a concern. PLLs utilize components like mixers and filters to achieve stable synchronization, which may explain their widespread use. Overall, while injection locking has its advantages, PLLs offer greater reliability and predictability in circuit design.
Fischer777
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
Sorry it's been a while since I posed here. I'm working on a project for school that will involve sending a synchronizing signal to an oscillator on a reciever, which I know often uses a phase-lock-loop. However, I was doing some reading on injection-locking, and it seems that it would be easier to utilize than a circuit involving several mixers, filters, and variable reactance components. But dispite this I can't find any instances where it's used in a practical circuit, so it somehow seems to be less preferable than PLLs. I'm wondering if anyone knows why this is the case (why PLL are preferred over injection-locking).

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Injection locking will lock the p'th harmonic of an oscillator to the q'th harmonic of a reference signal. Just which integer p/q ratio of harmonics can be hard to control or predict, and sometimes does not matter if drift is the only concern.

A PLL synthesiser has well defined integer ratio p/q, (a swallow counter), that locks a local VCO to a predictable frequency.
 
Okay, thanks! It makes more sense now.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
6K