Photocurrent shot noise correlation function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the correlation function of photocurrent shot noise for a photodiode, expressed as <\delta i(t)\delta i(t+\tau)> = \frac{e^2\eta}{h\nu}P\delta(\tau). The key variables include quantum efficiency (η), power (P), and the Dirac delta function (δ(τ)), indicating white noise characteristics. Participants express confusion regarding the derivation of the prefactor, particularly why the expression does not have units of {eP/hv}^2. Clarification is sought on the relationship between photon flux and current in this context. The inquiry highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying physics involved in shot noise correlation.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have stumpled upon the following expression for the correlation function of the photocurrent shot noise for a photodiode
<br /> &lt;\delta i(t)\delta i(t+\tau)&gt; = \frac{e^2\eta}{h\nu}P\delta(\tau)<br />
where η is the quantum efficiency and P the power in the signal. δ(τ) denotes the Dirac delta, which makes good sense as shot noise is white noise. However I am unsure of how the prefactor is derived. Can anyone point me in the right direction?Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
Hi

I have stumpled upon the following expression for the correlation function of the photocurrent shot noise for a photodiode
<br /> &lt;\delta i(t)\delta i(t+\tau)&gt; = \frac{e^2\eta}{h\nu}P\delta(\tau)<br />
where η is the quantum efficiency and P the power in the signal. δ(τ) denotes the Dirac delta, which makes good sense as shot noise is white noise. However I am unsure of how the prefactor is derived. Can anyone point me in the right direction?Niles.
I can point in a direction. Sorry that I don't have a text editor, but I think you will see what I am getting at.
{h\nu} is the energy per photon. "P" is the power of the light illuminating the photodiode, which means energy per second. So {h\nu}P is the number of photons per second illuminating the photodiode.
 
Last edited:
No, P/(hv) is the photon flux, which equals the number of electrons/sec. The current is therefore eP/(hv). So I think the question from Niles is: why doesn't the expression above have units of {eP/hv}^2?
 
marcusl said:
No, P/(hv) is the photon flux, which equals the number of electrons/sec. The current is therefore eP/(hv). So I think the question from Niles is: why doesn't the expression above have units of {eP/hv}^2?

Hi

Thanks, that is exactly my question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K