Photodynamic Inactivation of Herpes Virus

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemisttree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Virus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1). Participants explore anecdotal evidence of a chemist's success in curing individuals using a method involving exposure to light from a color TV, while questioning the scientific basis and efficacy of such an approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recounts a chemist's claim of curing HSV-1 using photodynamic therapy with proflavine and light from a color TV, citing a 1965 paper as a reference.
  • Another participant questions the specific mechanism of action, asking whether the effectiveness is due to light, Cerenkov radiation, or magnetic fields from the CRT.
  • Concerns are raised about the determination of "cure," noting that HSV-1 can remain latent and asymptomatic, which complicates claims of treatment success.
  • It is mentioned that the chemist did not confirm if patients were cured, as they merely stopped having outbreaks, which can naturally decrease over time.
  • Participants acknowledge the limitations of anecdotal evidence and the need for peer-reviewed sources in discussing the treatment of HSV-1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express skepticism regarding the claims of cure and the methodology used, indicating a lack of consensus on the effectiveness of the treatment. Multiple competing views on the mechanisms and validity of the treatment remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the anecdotal nature of the evidence presented and the potential for natural fluctuations in outbreak frequency, which may affect interpretations of treatment success. There is an emphasis on the need for peer-reviewed research to substantiate claims made in the discussion.

chemisttree
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
3,954
Reaction score
777
I once worked with a brilliant chemist who cured everyone in his very extended group of friends suffering from Herpes Simplex-1. His method was successful 100% of the time but did sometimes require several treatments (rarely)! Really amazing! He used a unique method of photodynamic therapy that involved treatment with proflavine and 5 minutes very close to the screen of a color TV. He had a very old paper that he referred to (circa 1965) that discussed the science behind it. He was asked to stop his activities since this amounted to practicing medicine without a license, but not before he had cured possibly 20-30 people. Here is a link to a recent study with references including the reference of the 1965 paper I referred to. Very interesting...

http://www.photobiology.com/photobiology2000/rodica1/index.htm
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Interesting. I've only skimmed the paper so far -- did the chemist figure out what about the CRT exposure was important? Was it the light (if so, why from a CRT? something about the phosphurs?), or maybe low-level Cerenkov radiation, or maybe the magnetic fields from the deflection yoke?
 
I suppose that it could have been any of those forms of radiation but he believed that it was the light energy itself that was responsible. He originally recommended black and white TV light for 15 minutes and later recommended color TV for only 5 minutes.

I don't know what channel he recommended...
 
How did he determine they were cured? HSV-1 can be latent for a long time without symptoms, so just being asymptomatic for a while after treating an outbreak doesn't mean they have been entirely rid of the virus. In most cases, the symptoms of an active outbreak will go away on their own anyway, so how does he know his "treatment" was doing anything at all?

*Puts on moderator hat.* Also, note that we generally do not permit discussion on non-peer-reviewed, non-published sources here. I'm going to give this a bit of leeway for discussion because the Independent Research forum on this site really doesn't cater well to biology topics, but all reading and participating should be advised this thread could be locked at any time, and reminded that anectdotal evidence is not conclusive.
 
Moonbear said:
How did he determine they were cured? HSV-1 can be latent for a long time without symptoms, so just being asymptomatic for a while after treating an outbreak doesn't mean they have been entirely rid of the virus. In most cases, the symptoms of an active outbreak will go away on their own anyway, so how does he know his "treatment" was doing anything at all?

*Puts on moderator hat.* Also, note that we generally do not permit discussion on non-peer-reviewed, non-published sources here. I'm going to give this a bit of leeway for discussion because the Independent Research forum on this site really doesn't cater well to biology topics, but all reading and participating should be advised this thread could be locked at any time, and reminded that anectdotal evidence is not conclusive.

He didn't determine if they were cured at all. They all just stopped having outbreaks. Some of the people he treated remained asymptomatic for years. These were people that had several outbreaks per year who were asymptomatic for years afterward.

As for this discussion coming from non-peer reviewed sources, I will limit my further comments to the field of photodynamic treatment of HSV-1 only. There are many peer reviewed sources of information available on the subject.
 
chemisttree said:
He didn't determine if they were cured at all. They all just stopped having outbreaks. Some of the people he treated remained asymptomatic for years. These were people that had several outbreaks per year who were asymptomatic for years afterward.
But that is typical of the infection. Early on, outbreaks can be very frequent, and then gradually become less frequent.

As for this discussion coming from non-peer reviewed sources, I will limit my further comments to the field of photodynamic treatment of HSV-1 only. There are many peer reviewed sources of information available on the subject.

Sounds good. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
50K