Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the differences between the photoelectric effect and the Compton effect, specifically focusing on why a photon is fully absorbed in the photoelectric effect while it is only partially absorbed in the Compton effect. The conversation touches on concepts of energy and momentum conservation in both phenomena.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions why a photon is absorbed entirely in the photoelectric effect but only partially in the Compton effect, suggesting a need for clarification on the nature of photon interactions.
- Another participant explains that in the Compton effect, conservation of momentum and energy prevents complete absorption of the photon, while the photoelectric effect allows for more flexibility due to the continuous energy states of electrons in a metal.
- A participant raises a question about the nature of inelastic collisions, specifically why a collision would be considered inelastic if the photon were completely absorbed.
- Mathematical reasoning is presented regarding energy and momentum conservation, showing that if a photon were completely absorbed, it would lead to a scenario where momentum would have to be zero, which is deemed physically meaningless.
- Another participant notes that the photoelectric effect involves a multi-particle system, allowing for various ways to conserve energy and momentum, unlike the simpler interaction in the Compton effect.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the implications of energy and momentum conservation in the context of the two effects. There is no consensus on the nature of inelastic collisions or the implications of complete photon absorption.
Contextual Notes
The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps regarding energy and momentum conservation, and the implications of these principles in the context of the photoelectric and Compton effects.