Photoelectric Effect and the human eye

daveyman
Messages
88
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Under favorable circumstances the human eye can detect 1.0e-18 J of electromagnetic energy. How many 600-nm photons does this represent?
(Modern Physics, Arthur Beiser, 6th Edition, Pg. 89)


Homework Equations


My answer is unreasonably low. My mistake is probably very simple, but I'm not sure what it is. Any ideas?


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I attempted to find the energy in a single photon with a wavelength of 600nm.
Since E=hf, I simply multiplied h and f.
I found f by the relationship f=c/lambda.
So, (6.626e-34)(3e8)/(600e-9) = 3.313e-19

Then, I just divided the total amount of energy by this amount (the amount of energy in a single proton).

(1.0e-18)(3.313e-19) = 3.02

I'm guessing that the eye can detect more than 3 photons at a time :-) but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Help!
 
on Phys.org
Yes, the eye can detect more than three photons at a time, but, according to this problem, apparently it can't detect less than 3 photons at a time. You are finding the minimum amount of 600nm photons the eye can detect, by utilizing the minimum energy the eye can detect.

Your work looks fine to me.
 
Thanks for the quick response! I'm glad to hear that my work makes sense, but how did you come to the conclusion that the given energy is a minimum? The way it is worded ("under favorable circumstances") it almost sounds like it would be maximum...
 
I interpreted "under favorable circumstances" as "maximum performance of the eye" i.e. the smallest amount of light the eye can detect will be less and less as it performs better.

So, I interpret the result as:

"Under favorable circumstances, i.e. when your eyes are performing at their very best, they can distinguish at least three photons at a time, but no less.

Also, we know for a fact that the eye can detect more than that amount of energy, so it can't be a maximum.
 
Oh! - the performance of the eye here is based on how little light the eye can still distinguish - I totally get it! That makes tons of sense, actually - thanks!
 
No problem.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K