Photoelectric effect experiment: is current proportional to charging time?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the photoelectric effect and its experimental setup, specifically focusing on the relationship between current and charging time in the context of measuring stopping voltage. The original poster introduces the fundamental concepts of the photoelectric effect and poses a question regarding the proportionality of charging time to current.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between current and charging time, questioning whether it is linear or follows a different pattern. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their assumptions, while others suggest investigating the data for potential exponential relationships.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and differing perspectives on the relationship between current and charging time. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the relationship, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of experimental data and the characteristics of the apparatus used in the photoelectric effect experiment. The original poster notes concerns about the linearity of the relationship, indicating a desire for clarification on the underlying physics.

quantumtimeleap
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm not really sure where to put this question, but definitely this is just an introductory physics coursework. Let me refresh you first with the basics of the photoelectric effect.

We all know that in the photoelectric effect the stopping voltage is just the kinetic energy obtained by the electrons displaced by the photons that struck the photodiode. Usually we experimentally measure the maximum stopping voltage because we only know the work function of the metal, which is the minimum energy needed to displace an electron from the surface.

The main result of the experiment is that the stopping voltage is proportional to the frequency of the incident radiation, and not correlated whatsoever to its intensity. Instead, it is the current generated that should be directly proportional to intensity, since intensity is simply the amount of photons carried by a light beam (and more photons incident on the metal means more electrons displaced --> higher current).

Also, the experiment includes measuring the charging time needed to achieve the stopping potential. This is the apparatus we used: ( http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~c173_608/photoelectric/he9370.pdf ). I'm pretty sure most photoelectric effect experiments use something similar, such that the stopping voltage is achieved after a nonzero charging time in the circuits of the apparatus.

My question is this: Is the charging time proportional to the current? One thing for sure is that the current is correlated to the charging time. More electrons received by the anode by the displacing effect of the photons should mean a faster time to achieve the stopping potential. I'm afraid of my hunches, but I think the relationship is probably not linear even disregarding noise and random error. Can anyone give me a definite yes or no? Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Long story, short answer: Current is charge per time, so: no, charging time is inversely proportional to current. As you remarked correctly: more current -> shorter time.
 
I would think that it will be an exponential relationship since you are dealing with the charging of a capacitor. You can use your data to investigate it. Play around with the % transmitted and the charging time data.
 
Last edited:
thank you, everyone! the data did turn out exhibiting something more complicated than a simple linear relationship ## I = k \frac{1}{\Delta t} ## for a proportionality constant k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K