Photon-Photon Scattering: Cross Section Calculations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the complexities of calculating the cross section for photon-photon scattering, emphasizing that photons cannot be treated as stationary entities. The S-matrix, which relates initial and final states of particles, is central to this analysis, and its calculation often employs the Dyson series in perturbation theory. The conversation highlights that photon-photon interactions are not directly present in the Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Lagrangian, making such scattering events rare and primarily mediated through higher-order Feynman diagrams involving photon-electron interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of S-matrix formalism in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Dyson series in perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of Feynman diagrams and their role in quantum field theory
  • Basic principles of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the S-matrix and its applications in particle physics
  • Learn about the Dyson series and its derivation
  • Explore Feynman diagrams and their significance in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the implications of photon-photon scattering in QED
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics and quantum field theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of photon interactions and scattering processes.

wukunlin
Gold Member
Messages
479
Reaction score
117
from what I know: cross section in particles physics can be seen as throwing random darts on ballons on a wall, ie the wall is stationary.

but if I want to work out the cross section of two laser beams at certain angles, the analogy above wouldn't hold would it? Since photons can never to stationary.

So in the case of photon-photon scattering, what sort of approach would be required to find the cross section?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure if I fully understand your question but it seems that you simply want to go from potential scattering to particle-particle scattering (including quantum field theory). Is that correct?

In both cases the fundamental entity is the so-called S-matrix Sfi which relates initial and final states of fixed momenta pi and pf. The S-matrix is related to the Hamiltonian H governing the time evolution of the system via the time evolution operator U. A well-known way to calculate S in perturbation theory is the so-called Dyson series which again can be used in both cases potential scattering and particle-particle scattering. In quantum field theory the Feynman diagrams are nothing else but graphical representations of Dyson series.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_matrix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_series (in terms of an interaction potential V)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram (in terms of an interaction term in the Lagrangian)

Btw.: Your example of light-light or photon-photon scattering is highly nontrivial. The reason is that in the QED Larangian (as in classical Maxwell theory) there is no interaction term for photons with photons, only for photons with matter currents (there is no term which involves a term with more than two photon fields A in the Lagrangian). That's why photon-photon scattering occures only in higher order Feynman diagrams mediated via photon-electron interaction and is highly suppressed (afaik not measurable experimentally)

http://www.colinfahey.com/eclectic_images_2002/gg-scat.jpg
 
tom.stoer said:
I am not sure if I fully understand your question but it seems that you simply want to go from potential scattering to particle-particle scattering (including quantum field theory). Is that correct?
to be honest I'm not really familiar with these terms. What I was asking was relevant but not as profound as the information you have given (which I greatly appreciated :) ). it was just some misconception I had which I managed to clear a little earlier today.

Thanks again for info, looks like I got a bit more studying to do (probably out of the course syllabus, but these do look like things that are nice to know)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
862
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K