Photonics vs Physics vs Mathematics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice of a PhD program in relation to research interests in energy advancement, specifically in areas such as anti-matter annihilation, fusion, and photonic laser thrusters. Participants explore the suitability of programs in photonics, physics, and mathematics, and the implications of choosing applied versus pure disciplines within these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether to pursue a PhD in photonics, physics, or mathematics, seeking insights on which would best align with their research interests in energy advancement.
  • Another participant suggests that applied or engineering physics may be suitable for energy-related research, while also noting that pure physics could be relevant.
  • There is a discussion on the distinction between applied and pure mathematics, with a focus on the applicability of applied mathematics to energy advancement research.
  • A participant questions the viability of an applied mathematics degree for research roles in antimatter or fusion, emphasizing the importance of relevant physics coursework and research experience.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential limitations of an applied mathematics background in contributing to energy advancement research, with a suggestion that the relevance of one's thesis will be crucial.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best academic path, with no consensus on whether physics or mathematics is more appropriate for energy advancement research. The discussion reflects differing views on the relevance of applied versus pure disciplines.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of prior coursework in physics and relevant research experience for admission into PhD programs, indicating that these factors may influence hiring decisions in research roles.

Gart11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering if perhaps someone could provide some insight as to the PhD program that would prepare me the best for what I would like to do research in one day. I am currently a mathematics undergrad with 2 semesters left. I am torn between getting a PhD in photonics, physics, and mathematics. I am just not sure which would be the best fit for my area of interest. The area I am interested in doing research is energy advancement i.e. anti-matter annihilation, fusion, photonic laser thrusters etc. Also, if one were to suggest say physics as the most appropriate for these areas of research, is there a particular area of physics that would be best? Mathematical physics? Particle physics? Theoretical physics? etc. Same with math, if one were to suggest math as an appropriate fit what would be better, applied or pure? Thank you for any and all honest feedback, I'm sure a lot of questions come through here like this, but I just can't seem to pick out which would benefit me the most in a research energy industry. Ideally I would like to go to graduate school in an area of mathematics, including mathematical physics, applied or pure math, and if one of these will get me into the above areas of research please let me know and which one, however, if an area of physics would be a better fit I would be more than willing to make the switch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gart11 said:
Also, if one were to suggest say physics as the most appropriate for these areas of research, is there a particular area of physics that would be best? Mathematical physics? Particle physics? Theoretical physics?

Applied or engineering physics in general. But pure physics does as well.

Gart11 said:
Same with math, if one were to suggest math as an appropriate fit what would be better, applied or pure?

"Applied" mathematics. The difference between pure and applied mathematics as study disciplines is that their emphasis is slightly different. But not very different.
 
Last edited:
But with a degree in applied mathematics would I be a viable candidate for getting hired to do research in antimatter research or fusion? Thank you for your response
 
Gart11 said:
But with a degree in applied mathematics would I be a viable candidate for getting hired to do research in antimatter research or fusion? Thank you for your response

I think it depends on how many courses you've studied in physics. If you've not done enough then it may require you to take more physics courses from somewhere or prove your knowledge of physics in other ways. Hiring also depends on the person and your previous research in the topic. In the admission to a PhD program they would be looking that you've studied relevant studies, have done some research (at minimum a thesis/dissertation that relates to the subject at some level) and/or have done some publications relating to the subject. Also work experience, if it's something related to the research.
 
Interesting. I definitely like the idea of applied mathematics. I like it's broad spectrum of application. I am just afraid that if I went down this route I may not be useful in energy advancement research. But I agree that will probably be reliant on my thesis indeed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K