Photon's Probability of Passing Through Polaroid

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of a photon in a mixed state passing through an x-polarized filter. The proposed approach suggests that the probability can be expressed as p(h->x) = |<h|x>||<h|x>|* = |a|^2. There is a clarification regarding terminology, noting that "Polaroid" is a trademarked term and should be referred to as "x-polarized film." Participants are encouraged to verify the accuracy of the proposed calculation method. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise terminology and mathematical formulation in photon physics.
eren.kizildag
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
When I am studying photon physics, one question come to my mind about mixed states. Let a photon be in the state |h> = (a;b) where (a;b) is a column vector with complex entries. How can we calculate the probability of its passing through an x-polaroid?

My approach: p(h->x) = |<h|x>||<h|x>|* = |a|^2.

But I'm not sure about it.. Can anyone check this idea whether it is true or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean an "x- polarized" film? "Polaroid" is a copyrighted brand name.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K