Physical motivation for integrals over scalar field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the physical motivations for using integrals over scalar fields, particularly in the context of temperature and density calculations. A line integral is highlighted as a method to determine the final temperature of an object traveling through a temperature field, emphasizing the dependence on both path and speed. The conversation also touches on the intuitive nature of integrals, such as integrating mass density to obtain total mass or energy density for total energy. The calculation of average surface temperature on Earth is presented as a practical example of applying these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of line integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with scalar fields in physics
  • Basic knowledge of temperature and density concepts
  • Awareness of heat transfer principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of line integrals in thermodynamics
  • Explore the concept of scalar fields in physics
  • Learn about the calculation of average temperature using integrals
  • Study the relationship between velocity and line integrals in heat transfer
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineers working with thermal systems, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of physical phenomena involving scalar fields.

Feynman's fan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for good examples of physical motivation for integrals over scalar field.

Here is an example I've found:

If you want to know the final temperature of an object that travels through a medium described with a temperature field then you'll need a line integral

It appears to me that the final temperature of our object would depend not only on its path (i.e. the image of the curve) but on the speed as well (if it spends a lot of time in an area with low temperature, it won't be reflected in its path but it clearly would be reflected in its final temperature). So it looks like the value of the integral would be parametrization-dependend (but it shouldn't).

So I have two questions:
  1. Am I right that the temperature example is off?
  2. What are some good examples of physical motivation for integrals over scalar field? (If possible, don't assume any knowledge of physics.)
Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feynman's fan said:
Am I right that the temperature example is off?
Impossible to say unless you specify the line integral. What makes you think the line integral cannot be made velocity dependent? You could very well also give the velocity as a function of the position in order to solve this. Although in reality it is not going to be a simple integral, the heat transfer generally depends also on the object's temperature.

Feynman's fan said:
What are some good examples of physical motivation for integrals over scalar field? (If possible, don't assume any knowledge of physics.)
So you want physics examples without physics? That sounds like a contradiction in terms.

This kind of integrals are probably the most intuitive ones you can find. Integrate a density and you get a total amount. For example, integrate mass density and you get total mass, integrate energy density and you get total energy.
 
I don't know whether this helps. However, I've asked myself how the average temperature on the Earth's surface is calculated? There often is a number around - I think 15°C something - and how it changed through times. The integral was the only solution I could think of.
I did not post it here, since probably someone would have shown up and started to debate the data stock, the timestamps, the distribution of measurements and so on and so on which won't let me expect a meaningful answer. Nevertheless, this global number is in this world and someone did the calculation despite all miseries.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K