Physically plausible explanation for artificial supernova

In summary, the conversation discusses various potential explanations for inducing a supernova, including detonating a large antimatter explosion in the star's core, using a powerful iron-based missile, or siphoning mass from a distant star through a wormhole. The participants also touch on the idea of transporting an entire star into the core to trigger the explosion. However, they acknowledge that these methods would require an immense amount of energy and technology beyond our current capabilities. They also consider the potential consequences and limitations of using such methods as a weapon.
  • #1
Prospero1
Hi,

What would be a plausible explanation for the induced supernova of a star? (Or at least an explanation that had a shot at being plausible!)

What about a large antimatter explosion in the star's core, perhaps deposited there through a small wormhole?

Or could some kind of missile be used? I'd imagine it would have to be vastly powerful, maybe iron-based? Or using antimatter?

Or is there some other creative way of doing it? This would preferably be to induce a near instantaneous explosion. I think they explode at 10% the speed of light, so you would just have to travel faster than that to escape the shockwave.

Many thanks for any replies!
:tongue:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Explosions won't do. The star would at best swell up a bit to maintain equilibrium, and then quickly revert back to the original state. At worst it wouldn't even notice - Tsar Bomba, the largest device ever detonated, had output equal to one billionth of the energy the Sun produces in one second.

The only way I'm aware of, is to dump enough mass onto a star in the form of heavy elements(neighbourhood of nickel/iron, to prevent fusion) to cause the core to collapse. You could also try dumping mass(can be even hydrogen) onto a white dwarf, to induce a type Ia supernova.

In any case, you'd need an absurd amount of mass. But since you have wormholes at your disposal, maybe use it to siphon some distant star's atmosphere onto a white dwarf? I can't imagine this being a quick process, though.
 
  • #3
Bandersnatch said:
Explosions won't do.

Actually I think he may be onto something here. Type Ia supernova ignition starts in the center of critical mass white dwarf: a slight local heating triggers thermonuclear burn.

If nuke would somehow be exploded in the core of slightly subcritical (by mass) white dwarf, it probably *can* trigger the burn.

This is about as plausible scenario as you can get. I have no plausible ideas how to transport the nuke to the core :/
 
  • #4
nikkkom said:
a slight local heating triggers thermonuclear burn

Thanks for the reply!

So how does the thermonuclear burn work, I've read about a 'thermonuclear cascade' before? I'm guessing that's the big burst of radiation that sweeps outward in a shockwave.

Any idea how big the explosion would have to be to trigger the reignition of nuclear fusion?
 
  • #5
Bandersnatch said:
But since you have wormholes at your disposal, maybe use it to siphon some distant star's atmosphere onto a white dwarf? I can't imagine this being a quick process, though.

Thanks for the reply, v. interesting.

Yeah one of the issues is the timescale. So the two options are detonating a nuke at the centre to reignite nuclear fusion in the star, or inject a large mass of iron to cause gravitational collapse.

Crazy idea, but what would happen if one used a wormhole to transport an entire star into the core, for example Proxima Centauri into the sun? :tongue:
 
  • #6
Bandersnatch said:
...you'd need an absurd amount of mass. But since you have wormholes at your disposal, maybe use it to siphon some distant star's atmosphere onto a white dwarf? I can't imagine this being a quick process, though.

Since I've also wondered about using this in a story, just how much mass would be needed for tipping a white dwarf past that point?
 
  • #7
B-McKinley said:
Since I've also wondered about using this in a story, just how much mass would be needed for tipping a white dwarf past that point?
Depends on the mass of the progenitor white dwarf. It explodes at about 1.4 solar masses. So, if you start with a 0.6 solar masses white dwarf(the typical mass), you'd need almost a Sun's worth of extra mass to dump on it.
That's why type Ia supernovae happen only in binary systems, where the companion star enters a supergiant phase, and starts losing its outer layers to the white dwarf.(or when two white dwarfs merge)

Prospero1 said:
Crazy idea, but what would happen if one used a wormhole to transport an entire star into the core, for example Proxima Centauri into the sun? :tongue:
This particular star would probably just make the Sun brighter and larger. I suspect a very old red dwarf, composed mostly of helium, could change the core composition enough to trigger red giant phase. But I don't won't to make any definite statements, as I don't understand the physics enough.
 
  • #8
Since this is for a Story you are writing I think the first thing we need to understand is the "why". Why are your characters attempting to trigger a supernova? what do they hope to gain from it? are they using it as a weapon or some other benign purpose?

The reason its important to understand this is because what you want to accomplish will require an insane amount of energy. Either making a powerful enough explosive or opening up a wormhole and dumping mass, you are talking about characters that have access to godlike amounts of power and technology and in the end it would probably take more energy to accomplish the task then they would get out of the supernova. Therefore there has to be some goal in mind that makes it worth the expenditure.

Give us some details and maybe we can work something out that is plausible.
 
  • #9
If this is a weapon, the technology required can't be such that would render the weapon obsolete. I think wormholes would probably fall under that category, but I'm not sure. Wormholes are such a game-changer that it's hard to imagine the implications.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
  • #10
Prospero1 said:
So how does the thermonuclear burn work, I've read about a 'thermonuclear cascade' before? I'm guessing that's the big burst of radiation that sweeps outward in a shockwave.

Any idea how big the explosion would have to be to trigger the reignition of nuclear fusion?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_detonation

Thermonuclear burn in detonating white dwarf of critical mass works just the same as in a hydrogen bomb. Fusion reactions in both cases are very temperature-dependent. When reaction rate is enough to cause noticeable heating, reaction enters a runaway loop: heating increases reaction rate, which in turn increases heating, and so on.

In a H-bomb, this makes thermonuclear burn to consume all LiD fuel in 20 nanoseconds (regardless of the bomb size).
In a detonating white dwarf, simulations show that detonation front from the center reaches star surface in something like 2 seconds.

To trigger a slightly subcritical dwarf, you don't need a humongous big bomb. I am not sure, but it's possible you don't need a big bomb at all. All it needs to do is to sufficiently heat a small amount of star material so that fusion reactions in this material start to heat it more by themselves.

The hard part is how to get the bomb into the star's core, but for sci-fi this should not be that hard :)
 
  • #11
I really like the antimatter idea. I'm not even sure you would have to get it to the core of the star. Just touching the surface should be good enough. If you don't mind me asking, why did you want to induce a supernova? If you want to use it as a weapon, obliterate a planet and kill all the inhabitants, then finesse really isn't a concern. If you want the debris after it cools down (and I assume loses much of its radiation), then I could see where it would very much matter how you blow your star upl
 
  • #12
Bandersnatch said:
Depends on the mass of the progenitor white dwarf. It explodes at about 1.4 solar masses. So, if you start with a 0.6 solar masses white dwarf(the typical mass), you'd need almost a Sun's worth of extra mass to dump on it.

In the movie Man of Steel General Zog decides he is going to turn Earth into the next Krypton by adding to its mass. The question I immediately had when I heard this scheme was: "Where is the extra mass going to be coming from?" Did they have the technology to open a wormhole at the center of the planet and import the mass from...elsewhere?

The next question I had was: "Even if you could do this why would you bother? It's too damn much work." The Kryptonians have FTL, why not go out and find a planet of the proper mass to begin with and terraform that one? For the sake of argument say you had the technology to turn Antarctica into a tropical paradise. Say that you're so advanced you could do this quite easily. No matter how little work is involved to turn Antarctica into a tropical paradise it will always be less work to move to the tropics. General Zog doesn't have to be ethical to spare Earth, being indolent will more than get the job done.
 
  • #13
Khatti said:
I really like the antimatter idea. I'm not even sure you would have to get it to the core of the star. Just touching the surface should be good enough.

Absolutely not enough. Upper layers of white dwarf are not compressed (since there is no material above them). At least a few tens of topmost meters are not even a degenerate matter, it's ordinary matter, with ordinary densities, and with relatively low temperatures (below 100k Kelvins).

The pressure and density, of course, quickly rises with depth, but pressure does start from zero at surface. The star is not a uniform ball with uniform conditions inside. The center is, by far, the densest location - the best place for triggering explosion.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Khatti said:
In the movie Man of Steel General Zog decides he is going to turn Earth into the next Krypton by adding to its mass. The question I immediately had when I heard this scheme was: "Where is the extra mass going to be coming from?" Did they have the technology to open a wormhole at the center of the planet and import the mass from...elsewhere?

Same, that film was terrible.

Khatti said:
The next question I had was: "Even if you could do this why would you bother? It's too damn much work." The Kryptonians have FTL, why not go out and find a planet of the proper mass to begin with and terraform that one? For the sake of argument say you had the technology to turn Antarctica into a tropical paradise. Say that you're so advanced you could do this quite easily. No matter how little work is involved to turn Antarctica into a tropical paradise it will always be less work to move to the tropics. General Zog doesn't have to be ethical to spare Earth, being indolent will more than get the job done.

Typical case of having an evil character do evil things...even when they make absolutely no sense. Aside from the fact that Earth seems to bestow god-like powers that take meer hours to acclimatise to why do they have to genocide a species by terraforming the planet? Terraform anywhere else!
 

1. What is an artificial supernova and how is it created?

An artificial supernova is a powerful explosion that occurs in a laboratory setting, rather than in outer space. It is created by using advanced technology to compress and heat a small amount of matter, similar to the conditions inside a real supernova. This triggers a chain reaction that results in a massive release of energy.

2. Why would scientists want to create an artificial supernova?

Scientists may want to create an artificial supernova for various reasons, such as studying the behavior of matter under extreme conditions, testing theories about the universe, and developing new technologies. It can also provide insights into the processes that occur during a real supernova.

3. Can an artificial supernova be dangerous?

Yes, an artificial supernova can be dangerous if proper precautions are not taken. The intense release of energy and radiation can pose a risk to the scientists and equipment involved. Therefore, strict safety protocols must be followed during its creation and observation.

4. How does an artificial supernova compare to a natural supernova?

An artificial supernova is significantly smaller and less powerful than a natural supernova. It is also a controlled and repeatable event, while a natural supernova is a rare and unpredictable occurrence in the universe. However, the physical processes and phenomena involved in both are similar.

5. What can we learn from studying artificial supernovae?

Studying artificial supernovae can help us better understand the physics behind these powerful explosions. It can also provide insights into the formation and evolution of stars, the elements they produce, and the effects of supernovae on their surrounding environments. This knowledge can have implications for our understanding of the universe and how it operates.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
386
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
817
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
3
Replies
102
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top