Mohammed Alqadhi
- 10
- 0
Does Physics need Philosophy?
The forum discussion centers on the relationship between physics and philosophy, with participants debating whether physics requires philosophical input. Key points include Richard Feynman's assertion that the philosophy of science is crucial for scientists, and Lawrence Krauss's perspective on the obsolescence of philosophy in light of physics advancements. Participants express frustration over vague questions and emphasize the importance of understanding both fields to engage meaningfully in the discussion.
PREREQUISITESStudents of philosophy and physics, educators in science and humanities, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of scientific theories.
Mohammed Alqadhi said:Does Physics need Philosophy?
Mohammed Alqadhi said:Does Physics need Philosophy?
Ivan Samsonov said:Theoretical physics (for example) is mostly philosophy, I think.
ZapperZ said:You have just insulted both theorists and philosophers
A good way of avoiding that is to make sure you know what you are talking about before commenting. You also did not answer ZZ's question. What do you think philosophers do? I would also like to add a question: What do you think theoretical physicists do?ISamson said:I apologise, I meant no insulting.
Like a fish needs a bicycle...Mohammed Alqadhi said:Does Physics need Philosophy?
Orodruin said:What do you think philosophers do?