Physics BS to engineering MS/phD

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter creepypasta13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the experiences and considerations of individuals who transitioned from a Bachelor of Science in Physics to pursuing a Master's or PhD in various engineering fields. Participants share their motivations for switching disciplines, the challenges faced, and the relevance of their physics background in engineering programs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their switch from a BS in physics to nuclear engineering, expressing a desire to have double-majored and highlighting their long-standing interest in nuclear energy.
  • Another participant raises the question of the viability of Applied Physics or Engineering Physics graduate programs, noting that some programs accept physics BS degrees and blend physics with engineering knowledge.
  • Concerns are expressed about the qualifications of graduates from engineering physics programs, with a participant fearing they may not be fully qualified as either engineers or physicists.
  • Some participants argue that physics students have equal opportunities as engineering students in graduate programs, while others suggest that physics students may need to catch up on undergraduate engineering courses.
  • A participant shares their successful transition to a master's in electro-optical engineering, motivated by employer support, and mentions not having prior engineering classes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the transition from physics to engineering, with some believing physics students can compete effectively while others highlight potential disadvantages due to the need for additional engineering coursework. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path for physics graduates considering engineering.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the requirement for a BS in engineering or a closely related field for many engineering programs, which may limit opportunities for physics graduates. There is also uncertainty about the adequacy of engineering physics programs in preparing students for careers in either field.

creepypasta13
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
has anyone here gotten their BS in physics, but then decide to get a MS or phD in engineering? What made you decide to switch to engineering: taking engineering classes and liking them, or working in industry full-time for a few years and then deciding to go into engineering? How did you decide what field of engineering to choose (EE, ME, materials, etc)?

as far as taking engineering classes to see if grad school in engineering is the right choice, I've heard various opinions, as some said its a good idea while others said its just a waste of time such that you're better off just sitting in the lectures or reading about engineering research areas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I switched in the middle of a BS program in physics (nuclear and astrophysics) to nuclear engineering, although in hindsight, I should have double-majored in physics and nuclear engineering. I was interested in nuclear energy since the 5th grade, and that was cemented when I designed a nuclear power aircraft as a science project in 6th grade.

Engineering is applied physics. In the nuclear engineering program, as an undergraduate and graduate, I took courses in mechanical engineering (corrosion, fracture mechanics, fluids and turbomachinery), materials, aerospace and electrical engineering (circuits, electric machinery, power systems, control theory).
 
I was going to make a similar post, but instead, I'll piggyback off of creepypasta here. In addition to the more "normal" engineering grad programs, what are your guys' thoughts on an Applied Physics or Engineering Physics grad program?

Most engineering programs I've looked into require a "BS in engineering, or a closely related field," so they're really looking for engineering students, not physics students as much, at least from what I understand. Maybe this thread will prove me wrong.

On the other hand, a few programs offer kind of a physics/engineering blend.

For example, Cornell has http://www.aep.cornell.edu/ which has a Masters of Engineering in Engineering Physics and Ph.D. program in Applied Physics through their Engineering Physics department.

Also, Embry Riddle just came out with a Ph.D. program in Engineering Physics which starts in 2010. http://www.erau.edu/db/degrees/phd-engineeringphysics.html

These majors specifically state that they accept physics BS degrees. The programs seem to give an engineering slant to physics knowledge.

On one hand, these might be a good suggestion for creepypasta to look into. On the other hand, my fear is engineering (or applied) physics masters or Ph.D. will be stuck somewhere in between the worlds of engineering and science. I'd hate to be in a situation where I'm not quite qualified to be an engineer, but also not quite qualified to be a physicist.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jack21222 said:
Most engineering programs I've looked into require a "BS in engineering, or a closely related field," so they're really looking for engineering students, not physics students as much, at least from what I understand. Maybe this thread will prove me wrong.

i think physics students have just as good a chance as engineering students
 
creepypasta13 said:
i think physics students have just as good a chance as engineering students

Well, we'll see what people with more experience have to say. The problem is, physics students would have to spend some time catching up on undergrad engineering courses before they can really do the graduate work, from what I understand. It seems to me that would give the engineering students an edge.

But again, I may be proven wrong in this thread.
 
I had a physics BS... then completed a masters degree in electro-optical engineering -- which was offered through "The School of Engineering" and had faculty from electrical engineering and physics faculty (from "the College of Arts and Sciences"). I didn't have any problems.

What was my motivation? My employer at the time (the USAF) offered to pay for the degree. I had no problems (4.0 GPA).
 
physics girl phd said:
I had a physics BS... then completed a masters degree in electro-optical engineering -- which was offered through "The School of Engineering" and had faculty from electrical engineering and physics faculty (from "the College of Arts and Sciences"). I didn't have any problems.

What was my motivation? My employer at the time (the USAF) offered to pay for the degree. I had no problems (4.0 GPA).

so before USAP offered to pay, you had taken no classes in engineering?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K