Physics Graduate Student killed himself because of unemployment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the tragic case of a physics graduate who reportedly took his own life due to unemployment and underemployment. Participants explore the implications of higher education, the job market for physics graduates, and the societal value of advanced degrees in relation to economic needs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express sadness over the graduate's situation, emphasizing the challenges faced by those pursuing advanced degrees in physics.
  • One participant argues that the rise of free higher education has led to an oversupply of graduates, resulting in diminished economic value for advanced degrees.
  • Others counter that individuals pursue doctoral degrees out of passion for their subject, contributing significantly to societal progress and technological advancements.
  • A debate emerges regarding the relative importance of PhD graduates versus tradespeople and engineers in driving progress, with some asserting that engineers and skilled laborers have historically played a more crucial role.
  • Concerns are raised about the mental health implications of unemployment and underemployment, with some suggesting that the individual may have suffered from mental illness rather than solely economic hardship.
  • Participants question the validity of claims about the job market for physics graduates, with some suggesting that it is becoming increasingly difficult.
  • One participant calls for data on suicide rates among PhD graduates compared to other educational backgrounds to better understand the issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the value of higher education or the factors contributing to the graduate's tragic decision. Multiple competing views remain regarding the role of advanced degrees in society and the job market for physics graduates.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the mental health of the individual and the economic landscape for physics graduates. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the societal value of higher education and the implications of unemployment.

sndtam
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Very sad story but true.Philip Elliott recently completed his doctorate degree in Physics. He was not able to find any job and decided to take a call center job. Graduate Programs are supposed to make people successful in academia. I feel very sorry for this guy.

Here is the full story.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...b-centre-qualified-for.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be harsh:
It is the entirely predictable result of making higher education "free" and into a "right" for everybody.
The simple truth is there simply is no economic need for "higher educated" on those large scales; most jobs existing today do NOT require 5 or 6 academic schooling (several though, requires many years of apprenticeship, which is something quite different).
 
Well, people don't into Doctoral degrees for making money or getting great paying jobs. They really love their subject and passionate about it. You might say there is no need for higher educated people but the world progressed a lot due to these people. Without the fundamental laws of physics, Engineers wouldn't be able to produce hi-tech devices and everything we take for granted might not be possible without these people. I really feel for this guy. It needs a lot of courage and patience to obtain a graduate degree in physics.
 
"You might say there is no need for higher educated people but the world progressed a lot due to these people"

Not really. Carpenters, factory developers and engineers have been far more important in developing "progress" than PhD-graduates.
 
arildno said:
"You might say there is no need for higher educated people but the world progressed a lot due to these people"

Not really. Carpenters, factory developers and engineers have been far more important in developing "progress" than PhD-graduates.

I am not under estimating the impotance of Engineers,I am studying an Engineering degree. But, I feel physics graduates are equally important for the growth.
For example,consider the possibility of a quantum computer.Research in such a subject can bring a revolution in processor speed and technolgy.
 
arildno said:
"You might say there is no need for higher educated people but the world progressed a lot due to these people"

Not really. Carpenters, factory developers and engineers have been far more important in developing "progress" than PhD-graduates.

Really? Who do you think invented the transistors, understood the basic properties of semiconductors for applications, come up with the diagnostic tools to study everything from DNA to medical drugs, etc... etc.? You didn't think a carpenter came up with the electron microscope or a PET scan, did you?

In a few years time, when we start making use of graphene and bendable 3D projection screen, I'm sure we will all forget where they started and who made the progress and invention.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Really? Who do you think invented the transistors, understood the basic properties of semiconductors for applications, come up with the diagnostic tools to study everything from DNA to medical drugs, etc... etc.? You didn't think a carpenter came up with the electron microscope or a PET scan, did you?

In a few years time, when we start making use of graphene and bendable 3D projection screen, I'm sure we will all forget where they started and who made the progress and invention.

Zz.
And if you believe that those who historically have driven forth progress (social/technological, economical) are PhDs, then you would be empirically dead wrong, until the 1950s or so. After that, THEN it is certainly true have joined the progressors (the chemists joining the league a half-century earlier or so). (Still, they are by no means alone, or supreme in that)

But, you have already forgotten that back history, haven't you?
 
If he meant to kill himself and didn't just accidentally fall, then I think most of this information about him is irrelevant. Mentally healthy people normally don't kill themselves because they run into hardships. The issue is the poor guy was probably mentally ill.
 
arildno said:
And if you believe that those who historically have driven forth progress (social/technological, economical) are PhDs, then you would be empirically dead wrong, until the 1950s or so. After that, THEN it is certainly true have joined the progressors (the chemists joining the league a half-century earlier or so). (Still, they are by no means alone, or supreme in that)

But, you have already forgotten that back history, haven't you?

Or have YOU forgotten what you wrote:

arildno said:
"You might say there is no need for higher educated people but the world progressed a lot due to these people"

Not really. Carpenters, factory developers and engineers have been far more important in developing "progress" than PhD-graduates.

Where did you make a qualification or caveat that you only CARED about "until the 1950's"? Furthermore, this is awfully silly. It's like saying that the cavemen didn't need a PhD to invent fire!

Look at what you wrote. You made wholesale dismissal of the contribution of those with PhDs. And the fact that with a more complicated world we live in, practically ALL of the current advancement that we have made int he 20th century were made by those WITH PhDs!

Or are you denying those inventions and progress that I've listed?

Zz.
 
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
Or have YOU forgotten what you wrote:



Where did you make a qualification or caveat that you only CARED about "until the 1950's"? Furthermore, this is awfully silly. It's like saying that the cavemen didn't need a PhD to invent fire!

Look at what you wrote. You made wholesale dismissal of the contribution of those with PhDs. And the fact that with a more complicated world we live in, practically ALL of the current advancement that we have made int he 20th century were made by those WITH PhDs!

Or are you denying those inventions and progress that I've listed?

Zz.
Where is "the wholesale dismissal"? I don't see it. I said "have been". Which happens to be true.
Nor are everyone else than yourself a caveman, just because you are a professional physicist.
 
  • #11
arildno said:
Where is "the wholesale dismissal"? I don't see it. I said "have been". Which happens to be true.
Nor are everyone else than yourself a caveman, just because you are a professional physicist.

"have been" can easily mean "until NOW". Read again what you wrote that I quoted, and tell me where it is clear under what time frame you were referring to. And it is quite obvious you missed the whole meaning of the "caveman" inference. Oh well...

I'm surprised you are this flimsy with your words.

Zz.
 
  • #12
Until we see data showing that the suicide rates of phds are significantly greater than those of high-school dropouts there is not much to say on this topic.Looks like really bad journalism to me.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
leroyjenkens said:
If he meant to kill himself and didn't just accidentally fall, then I think most of this information about him is irrelevant. Mentally healthy people normally don't kill themselves because they run into hardships. The issue is the poor guy was probably mentally ill.

The point I am trying to make is he didn't kill himself for nothing. He could not find a job and under employed in a call center which eventually caused the depression.
Don't you think the job market for physics graduates is becoming more difficult?
 
  • #14
Not really, because what I DID write was: "those who historically have driven forth progress"

If you think history began back in the caveman age of the 1950s, that's really your problem.
 
  • #15
sndtam said:
The point I am trying to make is he didn't kill himself for nothing. He could not find a job and under employed in a call center which eventually caused the depression.
Don't you think the job market for physics graduates is becoming more difficult?

It is becoming difficult, especially in most of the western world where economic and budget cuts are rampant. However, this isn't true elsewhere. I see a lot of Chinese physics PhDs, who used to stay in the US and Europe upon graduation, going back to China and gaining quite lucrative employment.

Secondly, the news article did not mention what this student majored or specialized in. I can point to you areas of physics in which we are SEEKING graduates (accelerator physics, detector physics, for examples). I've stated this many times before: what you majored in, what you have expertise in, and what you have skills in, all contribute very significantly in your "employability".

When I was in graduate school, a more junior physics graduate student hanged himself in his dorm room. People were quick to guess that it was a rigor and stress studying for the qualifying exam. No one is denying that there is such a stress, but we don't see massive suicides among all the students studying for such tests throughout the years. So it can't be simply due to that, and it wasn't. He had other issues.

The same goes here. We shouldn't trivialize this situation as simply him not being able to find a job. There are a lot of others in similar situation that did not take their lives.

Zz.
 
  • #16
bp_psy said:
Until we see data showing that the suicide rates of phds are significantly greater than those of high-school dropouts there is not much to say on this topic.

Oh! I don't know about other countries. In India, the unemployment rates for a PhD are really high about 13%. As I am thinking of getting a graduate degree in Physics, this really terrifies me..
 
  • #17
ZapperZ said:
It is becoming difficult, especially in most of the western world where economic and budget cuts are rampant. However, this isn't true elsewhere. I see a lot of Chinese physics PhDs, who used to stay in the US and Europe upon graduation, going back to China and gaining quite lucrative employment.

Secondly, the news article did not mention what this student majored or specialized in. I can point to you areas of physics in which we are SEEKING graduates (accelerator physics, detector physics, for examples). I've stated this many times before: what you majored in, what you have expertise in, and what you have skills in, all contribute very significantly in your "employability".

When I was in graduate school, a more junior physics graduate student hanged himself in his dorm room. People were quick to guess that it was a rigor and stress studying for the qualifying exam. No one is denying that there is such a stress, but we don't see massive suicides among all the students studying for such tests throughout the years. So it can't be simply due to that, and it wasn't. He had other issues.

The same goes here. We shouldn't trivialize this situation as simply him not being able to find a job. There are a lot of others in similar situation that did not take their lives.

Zz.

Yeah, I read a lot of your threads and I know that a lot of factors account for getting a job. Suppose someone wants do a Doctoral degree in High Energy theory. Do you think it's better to switch to employable fields like Condensed matter and Accelerator Physics??
 
  • #18
leroyjenkens said:
If he meant to kill himself and didn't just accidentally fall, then I think most of this information about him is irrelevant. Mentally healthy people normally don't kill themselves because they run into hardships. The issue is the poor guy was probably mentally ill.

You may be right, but I'm not sure there was enough information in the article to really know.

And there was no evidence mentioned in the article to show that his inability to land a physics job had anything to do with his suicide, it was just speculation.
 
  • #19
sndtam said:
Well, people don't into Doctoral degrees for making money or getting great paying jobs. They really love their subject and passionate about it.
That sounds like exactly the thinking that could lead to the suicide in the story you linked. It is harsh reality: unless you are independently wealthy, the purpose of college is to prepare you for a career so you don't find yourself 31 years old and with no job prospects and therefore unable to support yourself.
 
  • #20
arildno said:
To be harsh:
It is the entirely predictable result of making higher education "free" and into a "right" for everybody.
How in the world is higher education free? You do realize that here in the US many people are paying thousands upon thousands of dollars for higher education right? It is anything but "free" or a "right" here. Also, people should have more sympathy. We weren't in his shoes nor do we know what other psychological factors were wracking his brain.
 
  • #21
sndtam said:
Yeah, I read a lot of your threads and I know that a lot of factors account for getting a job. Suppose someone wants do a Doctoral degree in High Energy theory. Do you think it's better to switch to employable fields like Condensed matter and Accelerator Physics??

I cannot answer that.

Here's the thing. You should go into ANY field with your eyes wide open. If you go into areas which has a lower degree of employability, then you should be aware of it. Don't assume that just because you'll get a PhD, you'll have an easy time getting employment in that particular field. And certainly, don't go into it with blinders on without any connection to reality.

I know of many people who, once they make the realization, jumped fields to other areas. But I also know a lot that decided to stick it out and do what they love the most, knowing fully well that this might not turn into a career that they want. A lot of the latter group prepared themselves with other skills (especially computing/programming) as backups.

No one can decide for you what to do. All you can do is make yourself fully informed of the situation and prospect for the future. We all have different sets of priorities, and different tolerance to "risk".

Zz.
 
  • #22
WannabeNewton said:
How in the world is higher education free? You do realize that here in the US many people are paying thousands upon thousands of dollars for higher education right? It is anything but "free" or a "right" here. Also, people should have more sympathy. We weren't in his shoes nor do we know what other psychological factors were wracking his brain.

Yeah,the report does not contain any details as such. He might be having other problems in his mind.
 
  • #23
I have a Bs degree from the best university of turkey and I have been unemployed for more than 20 years.
I have mental illness, however, meds make miracles for me and I feel good.
unemployment or underemployment can cause depression and depression can cause suicide irrelevant of profession and the university degree.
 
  • #24
He jumped...

He fell...

He dove... This article cannot make up its mind.

It is the entirely predictable result of making higher education "free" and into a "right" for everybody.

If you do that you end up having more suitably qualified individuals ready to do jobs more competently than others. What you seem to be alluding to is regressive policies that centralize education to those that can attain it or those that can get through a ridiculous system set against them. This is why I consider it regressive.

I will say that this is more due to the result of allowing one-self to stay trapped within a certain environment and believing that the world class job is in that specific region. Sometimes, when you aren't able to get the job you want, it is better to try and find a similar position outside of the area you live, or country. All the positions may be taken up in one sector but that doesn't mean they are taken up everywhere. A more global system that is first world, is better for most.

This is the result of having tunnel vision (if he did kill himself because of lack of suitable employment), not because people have the right to education and making it free.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
Mentalist said:
He jumped...

He fell...

He dove... This article cannot make up its mind.

Skip to the bottom half of the article and read the quotes from the Coroner's "narrative verdict".

If that needs translating into American, the Coroner is the legal officer with the responsibility to decide the cause of death, by examining witnesses etc in a courtroom. A "narrative verdict" means he decided it was impossible to determine the cause beyond reasonable doubt, and therefore made a formal statement of the facts as to what happened. (The coroner's court proceedings and the verdict are public domain documents).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 119 ·
4
Replies
119
Views
17K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K