- #1

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

Please advise or suggest a good link, book, or anything. I'm more than willing to read more but what I've found doesn't answer my question.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter TheOldDog
- Start date

- #1

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

Please advise or suggest a good link, book, or anything. I'm more than willing to read more but what I've found doesn't answer my question.

- #2

NoPoke

- 125

- 1

- #3

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 43,021

- 971

- #4

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

So if the airplane rises it must expend at least the same amount of energy from the engine (assuming no losses) as the change in gravitational potential (plus whatever is needed to overcome drag/friction)?

- #5

mfb

Mentor

- 36,245

- 13,298

- #6

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

Got it. I think that set me on the right course, so to speak. :)

I was getting messed up with Bernoulli and flight but thinking about it in light of HallsofIvy's hint Bernoulli's principle seems more like buoyancy, or at least very similar.

- #7

NoPoke

- 125

- 1

[Bernouilli's principle is an application of conservation of energy.]

- #8

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

Work requires a displacement. Since there is no displacement (change in up/down) in level flight there is no work being done in that direction.

[Bernouilli's principle is an application of conservation of energy.]

- #9

NoPoke

- 125

- 1

- #10

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

? I always thought lift was "up" - but it seems to me you're saying lift has a horizontal component when the airplane is changing altitude?

- #11

NoPoke

- 125

- 1

- #12

rcgldr

Homework Helper

- 8,797

- 583

In level flight, the lift force the air exerts on the wing doesn't do any work, but the equal and opposing downwards force that the wing exerts on the air causes downwards acceleration of air, and there is a resulting downwards veloctiy at the moment the affected air's pressure returns to ambient. So there is work being performed on the air (so part of the process of generating lift and drag violates Bernoulli).

Note that all that energy generated by the engine is being transferred to the air, changing it's kinetic energy (and somewhat it's temperature). In the case of a glider in a steady descent (fixed speed and glide ratio), the decrease in gravitational potential energy corresponds to an increase in energy of the air.

The change in momentum of a volume of air as a wing passes through would correspond to the impulse (force x time) generated by the wing. I'm not sure of the net change in pressure of the air just after the wing passes by.

Last edited:

- #13

NoPoke

- 125

- 1

And completely out of my depth with the following because I thought that Bernouilli's principle can be applied to a wing whose airstream is attached and that was in practice how the wing pressure curves were actually calculated by computer simulation.

- #14

TheOldDog

Gold Member

- 7

- 0

When someone earlier mentioned weight, as opposed to load, it threw me off since weight is strictly a downward (toward gravity) force.

If lift is always perpendicular to thrust and thrust is always in the direction of travel, with load and drag, respectively, being opposite those forces, I can live with that. I've spent my whole life translating from one coordinate system to another so whatever convention you want to use is fine with me. :)

- #15

rcgldr

Homework Helper

- 8,797

- 583

But then you'd need a mathematical model to predict the local airstreams speeds, and such a model could also predict the pressure differentials as well, since the changes in air speed coexist with changes in pressure, although not quite, since some work is down on the air, resulting in a net wash that is mostly downwards (lift) and somewhat forwards (drag). Usually a somewhat simplified form of Navier Stokes Equations is used to model airfoils.And completely out of my depth with the following because I thought that Bernouilli's principle can be applied to a wing whose airstream is attached and that was in practice how the wing pressure curves were actually calculated by computer simulation.

- #16

NoPoke

- 125

- 1

So correct me if I have this wrong: at the point in the model where you have enough information to successfully apply Bernouilli's principle you no longer need to apply Bernouilli's principle?But then you'd need a mathematical model to predict the local airstreams speeds, and such a model could also predict the pressure differentials as well, since the changes in air speed coexist with changes in pressure, although not quite, since some work is down on the air, resulting in a net wash that is mostly downwards (lift) and somewhat forwards (drag). Usually a somewhat simplified form of Navier Stokes Equations is used to model airfoils.

- #17

rcgldr

Homework Helper

- 8,797

- 583

My understanding is that a model has to deal with co-dependencies between pressures and speeds, so it can't just calculate one of the parameters and then use Bernoulli to calculate the other. Also Bernoulli is violated by the amount of work done by a wing onto the affected air, but I don't know by how much.At the point in the model where you have enough information to successfully apply Bernouilli's principle you no longer need to apply Bernouilli's principle?

- #18

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,545

- 2,317

If lift is always perpendicular to thrust and thrust is always in the direction of travel, with load and drag, respectively, being opposite those forces

At the risk of confusing people...

A body moving through the air experiences forces distributed all over it's surface. You can resolve these into orthogonal lift and drag components if you want (eg for convenience) but it's not true to say that they exist in that form.

Consider an aircraft in a vertical dive. The horizontal forces must sum to zero because it's not accelerating horizontally. Weight is acting in the same plane as thrust so the lift force is zero (or close to zero).

When you get onto looking at stability it's necessary to resolve these forces into one that includes a torque or pitching moment but I've long forgotton all the details. Just to say that this is

Last edited:

- #19

rcgldr

Homework Helper

- 8,797

- 583

Cambered air foils generate a downwards pitching torque. For stability, most aircraft have the center of mass in front of the center of lift, which also produces a downwards pitching torque, countered by a downwards lifting force at the tail that produces an upwards pitching torque, sensitive to the air speed. Once trimmed, if the aircraft pitches up, it loses speed, the tail generates less torque, so the nose drops and the aircraft gains speed again. If the aircraft pitches down, it gains speed, the tail generates more torque, so the nose rises and the aircraft loses speed. The idea is that the tail is trimmed so that the aircraft tends to remain in level flight at a specific speed without control inputs, and it's called positive pitch stability.When you get onto looking at stability it's necessary to resolve these forces into one that includes a torque or pitching moment but I've long forgotton all the details. Just to say that this is one reason why the lift force on the tail of most conventional aircraft is downwards in level flight.

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 319

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 594

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 383

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 587

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 526

- Replies
- 24

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 421

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 289

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 589