(Physics Ph.D.) Berkeley or Princeton.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for choosing between graduate programs at Berkeley and Princeton, specifically in the field of condensed matter experiment, focusing on topological materials and 2D materials. Participants share their perspectives on the research environments, living conditions, and personal experiences related to both institutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a dilemma between choosing Berkeley and Princeton, highlighting both schools' strong reputations and suitable research groups.
  • Another participant suggests that the decision should focus on the research groups and the living environments of each school, emphasizing the importance of personal happiness for success.
  • Weather conditions are discussed, with multiple participants favoring Berkeley's climate over Princeton's, though opinions vary on the significance of this factor.
  • A participant shares their positive experience visiting Berkeley and compares it to their hometown, Shanghai, while also noting the strong research groups at both universities.
  • Concerns about future job opportunities in the Bay Area and NYC are raised, indicating that career prospects are an important consideration in the decision-making process.
  • Another participant inquires about the original poster's academic background and offers to share their own experience, noting the variability in how graduate schools evaluate applicants.
  • One participant congratulates the original poster on their research achievements, expressing admiration for their publications as an undergraduate.
  • There is a discussion about Dirac materials, with one participant noting Princeton's strength in this area and suggesting that personal preference should play a significant role in the decision.
  • The original poster acknowledges the appeal of both schools and expresses uncertainty about their happiness at Princeton despite its strong program.
  • Plans to visit both universities and attend open houses are mentioned as a way to help make the final decision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both Berkeley and Princeton are excellent choices, but there are multiple competing views regarding the importance of research groups, living conditions, and personal happiness in making the decision. The discussion remains unresolved as participants weigh these factors.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the significance of environmental factors, research group reputations, and personal experiences, indicating that the decision is highly subjective and context-dependent.

christliang
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
I am now facing a dilemma of making a choice between Berkeley and Princeton. My intended research field is condensed matter experiment, especially topological materials and 2D materials. Both graduate schools have the suitable group for my research of interests. Also, I know both of them have very great reputations.

I know it is odd to get the advice from strangers don't know me well, but it is really important for me to get something other than my understanding of both schools. Because I am an undergraduate from China, I may not know how native Americans consider these two graduate schools.

Hope someone could help me with the decision.

Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both schools are great. Your choice is between research groups. Do you know any of the people?

Also, they are very different environments for living. You should read about them and decide if you'll be better off in one or the other. This should be a factor in your decision, as your happiness in your surroundings is important to your success.
 
The weather at Berkeley will be a million times better.
 
QuantumCurt said:
The weather at Berkeley will be a million times better.

But with a disturbing sameness that you won't get at Princeton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Niflheim
True, but that's a matter of taste I suppose. I'm from northern Illinois. It's 43 degrees right now and it feels incredibly warm compared to the last few months. I could do without that. We've got snow melting, and it's turning into a slushy nightmare right now. I could do without that too...lol
 
Yes, I am also thinking about the weather condition. I visited Berkeley last year for 5 months, and it is really attracting. In addition, SF is a very nice city which I think is similar to SHANGHAI, my hometown.

The groups of both universities are all of my great interests. In Berkeley the quantum optics group of FENG WANG has a growing reputation these years and really did very good job last year, while in princeton NAI PHUAN ONG's group is a perfect place too.

Could you guys provide me with some information about finding a job related or unrelated to doing research in bay areas and NYC? I think I must take my future development into consideration.

THX!
 
If you don't mind me asking, what are your stats/research experience/other that got you into both of those schools? Any advice for college underclassmen? I hope I'm in your position in a few years.
 
Alexmer said:
If you don't mind me asking, what are your stats/research experience/other that got you into both of those schools? Any advice for college underclassmen? I hope I'm in your position in a few years.
I am very glad to share my experience with you, but I have to say at first every individual is different. You must find out the most efficient way to get to the position.

I have an average GPA of 3.66/4.0, but I almost get straight A in all physics courses. I have three years undergraduate research experience. In addition, I got the opportunity to have a 5 months exchange program in Berkeley in my junior year. I did quantum optics experiment about 2D materials in FENG WANG's group, which may help me a lot to somewhat enhance my research background. In my home university, my research of interests are mainly about Dirac materials. So far, I have three publications. One 1st author(equal contribution) under 2nd round review in Nature Material, two cooperated papers on Nano letters and ACS nano.

I think different graduate school evaluates applicants in different ways. As far as I know, Berkeley does not really care about your GPA, but it really pays more attention on your major GPA and GRE SUB. Princeton may has the same style as Berkeley. For MIT&Harvard, which I also applied to, they may care about your GPA, especially your grades of MATH & PHYS courses. However,all of these top graduate school lay a great emphasis on your undergraduate research experience.

In brief, you must try your best to keep your GPA at a relative good level. Meanwhile, you should spend more time in the lab. If you can have some publications to proof your research skills, it will be very helpful in your application.
 
3 publications as an undergrad? That's nuts. Congrats.
 
  • #10
When you say Dirac materials, do you mean Dirac semimetals? The reason I ask is because a lot of the recent experimental results in that field have come from Cava's group at Princeton. Princeton overall seems to do a lot of experimental work on TIs and other materials. I don't know about Berkeley's experiment group in that area, but I do know that two of the theorists are very interested in topilogical materials so I would assume there is a good experimental focus on it as well.

I would just visit both schools and see what you think. Talk to a lot of different people to get a good idea of the place. Both are obviously great so I think at this point your personal preference should be a big factor in your decision. I really think it's important that you consider this because you will be most productive if you are happy.
 
  • #11
radium said:
When you say Dirac materials, do you mean Dirac semimetals? The reason I ask is because a lot of the recent experimental results in that field have come from Cava's group at Princeton. Princeton overall seems to do a lot of experimental work on TIs and other materials. I don't know about Berkeley's experiment group in that area, but I do know that two of the theorists are very interested in topilogical materials so I would assume there is a good experimental focus on it as well.

I would just visit both schools and see what you think. Talk to a lot of different people to get a good idea of the place. Both are obviously great so I think at this point your personal preference should be a big factor in your decision. I really think it's important that you consider this because you will be most productive if you are happy.

Yes, Dirac semimetals are exactly what I am doing and plan to further. One of my publications under reviewed in Nature Material is about this topic. I do know Princeton is really strong in this field, but I do not know if I will be happy there. Both choices are really appealing to be. Berkeley is always with sunshine and I really love the living style there, as well as it has something I am interested in, while Princeton is good at a topic(a very hot topic in the past few years) which I am really interested in and have a good knowledge of. I know either one is perfect and if I choose any one, I will feel somewhat regret not to choose the other.

I think the only way for me is to have a visit to both universities. Indeed, I am going to attend the open house of both of them, and hope I will figure out the answer then.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K