Physics Problem Conservation of Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving conservation of energy, specifically related to a skier's motion down a slope and subsequent interactions with snow. The problem includes calculations of speed, forces, and energy considerations in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for the skier's speed and the average force exerted by a snowdrift. There are attempts to derive the average force using the work-energy theorem and considerations of deceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations that yield similar results, while others question the validity of the approach to finding average force. There is an exploration of the implications of using different values for gravitational acceleration and the significance of significant figures in the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may have constraints regarding the definition of average force and the assumptions made about uniformity in deceleration. There is also mention of the expectations around significant figures in the context of the problem.

John_Smithson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 60.0 kg skier starts from rest at the top of a ski slope 60.0 m high.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(a) If frictional forces do -10.5 kJ of work on her as she descends, how fast is she going at the bottom of the slope?
This one I got correct, it's 28.8 m/s.

(b)Now moving horizontally, the skier crosses a patch of soft snow, where µk = 0.2. If the patch is 85.0 m wide and the average force of air resistance on the skier is 160 N, how fast is she going after crossing the patch?
This one I also have correct, 6.35 m/s

(c) The skier hits a snowdrift and penetrates 2.9 m into it before coming to a stop. What is the average force exerted on her by the snowdrift as it stops her?

I derived the equation F = m*(Velocity from answer B)^2/(2*2.9m). This gets me 417N. However, it is not the right answer. I also know that the sign is not the problem, as neither 417N or -417N give the right answer. I used the work energy theorem to get F*d = 1/2m(VB)^2, and then just divided the kinetic energy by the distance to get the average Force. I don't know what I am doing worng.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get 417 N, too.

If the deceleration is not uniform and the force gets averaged over time, the value can be different (and you cannot calculate it with additional information), but that cannot be the issue here.[/size]
 
If I do the calculations using g = 9.807 m/s the result is 414 N. I wonder how sensitive the marking bot is to sig figs here?
 
Even though the highest sig figs in the problem is 3, it does expect you to use g = 9.807 instead, and 414N was correct. Thanks.
 
Part c is a wrong question. This comes up regularly. You cannot compute the "average force" from the energy and the distance. Yes, you can compute an average over distance, but consider this: average acceleration is defined as an average over time, Δv/Δt. So the reasonable definition of average force is also over time; for constant mass it's mΔv/Δt. That is not in general the same as an average ov distance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K