Physics Q: Travel Faster than Light? E=MC^2?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Universe_Man
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the possibility of traveling faster than light and the implications of Einstein's equation E=mc². Participants explore theoretical and experimental perspectives on the speed of light and its relationship to energy and mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the impossibility of faster-than-light travel and asks about relevant tests or experiments.
  • Another participant mentions that particle accelerators test the limits of speed, suggesting that if classical mechanics held, particles could exceed the speed of light.
  • A different participant refers to the infinite energy requirement as described by the relativistic equation, raising a technical point about the implications of approaching light speed.
  • One participant claims that faster-than-light travel is possible, citing Cerenkov radiation as an example of particles exceeding light speed in a medium, and introduces Inflation Theory as a concept related to faster-than-light expansion in the universe.
  • Another participant clarifies that while parts of the universe can recede faster than light due to the expansion of space, this does not equate to objects traveling faster than light within space, and mentions tachyons as a speculative concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the possibility of traveling faster than light, with some supporting the idea and others adhering to mainstream physics that restricts such travel. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding definitions of speed, the context of faster-than-light travel, and the assumptions underlying the claims about Cerenkov radiation and Inflation Theory.

Universe_Man
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
This may sound mind numbingly stupid to those who are seasoned in Physics, but how do we know that it is impossible to travel faster than light? Have there been tests or experiments? and also, what does the speed of light have to do with the amount of energy in a given amount of mass (E=MC^2)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Particle accelerators test it every day. If f=ma held at high-speed, they'd be accelerating particles to much faster than the speed of light.
 
is it just because of the infinite energy requirement from 1/((1-(v/c)^2))^.5)?
 
Actually, it is possible to travel faster than light.

Cerenkov radiation is the blue glow in reactor pools that can be likened to a "sonic boom" caused by neutrons traveling faster than light in water.

http://www.physics.upenn.edu/balloon/cerenkov_radiation.html

Or did you mean faster than c?

You need Inflation Theory then!

http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/John_Gribbin/cosmo.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Farsight said:
Or did you mean faster than c?

You need Inflation Theory then!

Even now, there are parts of the universe receding from one another at rates faster than c, but this is not quite the same as traveling at faster than c. The overall expansion of space is not restricted in the same way as objects traveling through it. Unless one believes in tachyons, it's not possible to travel faster than the speed of light within the bounds of mainstream theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K