Physics or Actuarial Science: Which Path Should I Choose?

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for an undergraduate student contemplating a career path between physics and actuarial science. Participants explore the implications of various educational options, career prospects, and personal interests related to both fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a physics degree may require further academic motivation for advanced degrees, as a simple undergraduate degree might not be appealing to employers outside of teaching.
  • Others argue that actuarial science offers high salaries but may involve repetitive work and extensive exam requirements, which can be daunting and time-consuming.
  • A participant notes that actuarial work is more of a business job with a mathematical component, rather than a pure math or science role.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of obtaining actuarial positions without passing several exams, with some claiming that the first few exams may not be as mathematically intensive as expected.
  • Some participants highlight the potential for burnout in actuarial roles due to heavy workloads during certain times of the year.
  • There is a suggestion that mathematical finance could be a more interesting and potentially lucrative alternative, though it may come with longer hours and higher stress levels.
  • A participant mentions that programming skills might be more beneficial than specializing in actuarial science, especially if the student is uncertain about their career path.
  • Discussions also touch on the geographical concentration of job opportunities in both fields, with physics jobs often localized in specific regions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on which career path is superior. Some favor actuarial science for its financial benefits, while others advocate for physics based on personal interest and academic motivation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for the student.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying perceptions of job satisfaction and the nature of work in both fields, as well as differing views on the importance of business acumen in actuarial roles. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about job market dynamics and the impact of educational choices on career outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

Undergraduate students considering careers in physics, actuarial science, or related fields, as well as individuals interested in the implications of educational paths on career opportunities in STEM disciplines.

  • #31
So, if I get a degree in actuarial science, is that too narrow to be able to pursue something like mathematical/computational finance, statistics, etc? (in case I end up deciding that actuarial is not for me)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hey,

Are there any actuaries on this forum? If so, can you tell us a little bit about your background and about how you got into the actuarial profession. I am seriously considering pursuing a career as an actuary, but I would like to learn more about the job and what kind of people like it.

Thank you.
 
  • #33
Wow, talk about a enough with the euphemistic language, I mean actuarial science, SCIENCE?, really?

Excuse me I have to get back to my job as Ancillary Ground Bovine Technician.
 
  • #34
yoyo100 said:
Are there any actuaries on this forum? If so, can you tell us a little bit about your background and about how you got into the actuarial profession. I am seriously considering pursuing a career as an actuary, but I would like to learn more about the job and what kind of people like it.

Have you read through the actuarial outpost FAQ thread I posted earlier here? It is invaluable to someone considering the profession.

I'm an actuary (well, actuarial analyst is more accurate, which denotes that I'm early in my career). My background is a BS and MS in physics, with a couple of years experience working for a private company doing research.

I got into the actuarial profession by taking Exam FM and contacting a recruiter. I've had my job for less than a year now, and have thoroughly enjoyed it so far. This is the most satisfied I've ever been with my career, though there is still plenty of time for that to change ;)

As for what kind of people are actuaries, well first and foremost, you need to understand (as I've mentioned earlier in the thread) that actuaries are business people first and anything else (statisticians, mathematicians, researchers etc.) second. The culture in an actuarial department is very different from, say, the sales department, but it is also different from a university or private research department.

I also have some bad news - it is currently very hard to get an entry level job as an actuary. There is still a shortage of credentialed actuaries, but firms just aren't hiring new entry level people. It's always been a bit harder to break into the career than it is made to sound, and the economy has exacerbated that. However, if you are still a year or more from looking for a job, things could be very different by the time you do.

To be honest, the question of what kind of people are actuaries is hard to answer. If you can narrow it down any, or have other specific questions, I'd be happy to help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
26K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K