Piecewise functions how to graph it

  • Thread starter Thread starter laker_gurl3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Graph
Click For Summary
Graphing piecewise functions on a TI-83 calculator can be challenging, especially when syntax errors occur. Users have reported issues with entering the function correctly, particularly the use of brackets versus braces. It's suggested to ensure the calculator is in the correct mode and to follow specific formatting guidelines from reliable sources. Alternatives like Maple can also be used for graphing, with sample code provided for those who prefer software solutions. Proper guidance and resources are essential for successfully graphing piecewise functions.
laker_gurl3
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Okay so i found a link online that's supposed to help you graph piecewise functions..i have a TI-83 graphing calculator and I can't seem to graph the function..
http://fym.la.asu.edu/~tturner/MAT_117_online/piecewisefunction/Piecewise.htm
http://fym.la.asu.edu/~tturner/MAT_117_online/piecewisefunction/Piecewise.htm

I'm still trying to understand how they graphed the first function. I tried putting it into the calculator like Y1= X, {-1,1} but it shows an error..can anyone guide me through it?
thanks so much
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just bumping this up, because i need to know by tomorrow :( thanks alooot in advance..
 
I've never done piecewise functions on my calculator, and I got the first one to work fine (fx-9750).

The only thing I could suggest is you said you put Y=X,{-1,1} , whereas the website says to use square brackets? [ ]
 
hmmm..so what did you put exactly in ur calculator? and do you have a TI-83? does it have to be on a specific mode or something?
i tried
Y1 = X,{-1,1}
and
Y1= X,[-1,1]

AFter that when i press it to graph it, it comes up as ERR: Synthax...
ahh! :(
 
Do you have to use a Graphing Calculator?

If not, perhaps you can use Maple.

I'll include sample code in the case you are able to use Maple.

Code:
with(plots):
points := {[-1,-1],[-0.96,-0.151],[-0.86,0.894],[-0.79,0.986],[0.22,0.895],[0.5,0.5],[0.93,-0.306]}:
p := pointplot(points, color=sienna, labels=[x,y]):
p1 := -806.517475*(x+1.0)^3 + (-25)*(-0.96-x) + (-2.48457204)*(x+1.0):
one := plot(p1, x=-1..-0.96, y=-1.5..1.5, color=red):
p2 := -322.60699*(-0.86-x)^3 + (-174.2004278)*(x+0.96)^3 + 1.7160699*(-0.86-x) + (10.68200428)*(x+0.96):
two := plot(p2, x=-0.96..-0.86, color=orange):
p3 := -248.857754*(-0.79-x)^3 + (2.687788307)*(x+0.86)^3 + (13.99083157)*(-0.79-x) + (14.07254412)*(x+0.86):
three := plot(p3, x=-0.86..-0.79, color=yellow):
p4 := 0.1862823579*(0.22-x)^3 + (-0.5797228909)*(x+0.79)^3 +
(0.7862109904)*(0.22-x) + (1.477513935)*(x+0.79):
four := plot(p4, x=-0.79..0.22, color=green):
p5 := -2.091143285*(0.5-x)^3 + (-0.7539202345)*(x-0.22)^3 +
(3.360374205)*(0.5-x) + (1.844821632)*(x-0.22):
five := plot(p5, x=0.22..0.5, color=blue):
p6 := -0.4909248039*(0.93-x)^3+(1.253562694)*(0.93-x)+(-153/215)*(x-0.5):
six := plot(p6, x=0.5..0.93, y=-1.5..1.5, color=magenta):
display(p, one, two, three, four, five, six);

It generates the following graph

http://www.s119875471.onlinehome.us/piecewise.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
those sites are about graphing piecewise functions, but it's obvious it's not using a ti83, it wouldn't make sense that it'd work. Anyhow, here's a link that should help youhttp://www.acad.sunytccc.edu/instruct/sbrown/ti83/funcpc.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
925
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K