WhoWee
- 219
- 0
nismaratwork said:...And err on the side of sharing munitions with those who don't respond.
No need to waste munitions - bomb them with rocks.
nismaratwork said:...And err on the side of sharing munitions with those who don't respond.
WhoWee said:No need to waste munitions - bomb them with rocks.
nismaratwork said:If you have any rifle (assault, long, hell have a PSG-1!) would you open fire on a crew with an RPG, maybe a .50 cal, and more Kalashnikovs than can comfortably be imagined?
Sounds like suicide...
...unless you're part of a group, and in your case you benefit from training
Still, sniping on water is HARD, so you're losing means of attrition at a distance; you also lose the range of your assault rifle.
You're right about the navy however, but we could put in a request to contractors to design an armed drone, specializing in automated tracking in the region, and then under human control, firing on anyone suspicious who doesn't respond to any form of IFF, even optical-semaphore.
We don't need to stop them all, just make it a bad investment.
xxChrisxx said:Would you don your red bandana too?
mugaliens said:If pirates (not valid flag parties) attempted to board my vessel, I'd unlever every single god-damned thing I had aboard to prevent their heinous unlawful activities from ever, period.
Oh, I dunno... I'm a pretty good shot with a long rifle out to about a mile...
mugaliens said:In San Fran it'd earn one a rapid butt-(unmentionable)
What, xxChrisxx, are you talking about with respect to flags on an international scale?
Please grow a brain. Your "flags" aren't shared around the world. Dah!
WhoWee said:I still like my idea better. Get a big helicopter and a giant bucket to fill with rocks. Fly over the boat - aim and drop the load > boat fills and sinks - pirates swim home a few hundred miles.
WhoWee said:Btw - sand is a good alternative and a quick water re-load could be fun as well - most anything will sink a fishing boat.
mugaliens said:I've sailed the open seas (I've an open ocean skipper's license from the US Navy), though not around the world, and certainly not in those parts.
Would I open fire on a crew? That depends entirely upon what that "crew" was attempting to do. If it was a legitimate boarding party (any number of countries' customs or harbor masters), no issue. But those relationships are almost always establish, and almost always with the appropriate paperwork (including various electronic and physical stamps of approval).
I learned to sail back in high school, and continued ever since, obtaining various licenses wherever I could, whenever I could.
I'd been planning a post-retirement round-the-world cruise (smaller, open-ocean sailing yacht circa 40-50 ft) for myself and my family from 1999 to 2005. My ex nixed that in 2005 with her plans for divorce, so, ptueyeui, and the lawyers got most of our saved funds. BIG HINT - GO WITH A MEDIATOR. You might wind up $1,200 in the hole instead of $50,000 in the hole. Moving on...
mugaliens said:...to Yes. If pirates (not valid flag parties) attempted to board my vessel, I'd unlever every single god-damned thing I had aboard to prevent their heinous unlawful activities from ever, period.
Oh, I dunno... I'm a pretty good shot with a long rifle out to about a mile...
mugaliens said:All the better. And if you've ever hung around these groups, you'll know most aren't taking this, er.., a four letter word meaning excrement, beginning with "s,"...
Lying down.
So are they. So what. What's new. If I were to replan my trip today, I'd include whereabouts of the U.S. Navy, but I'd also plan to put into port a hell of a lot less than I'd originally planned on account of the pirate situation which has developed in the region.
mugaliens said:Wow, nismaratwork. Let's microtag their vessel from the drone, while we're at it. An http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-114_Hellfire" will absolutely decimate it's target.
mugaliens said:Perhaps all we international sailors would need to arm ourselves with would be laser designators and a full suite of anti-jam communications to call in the troops where needed.
mugaliens said:Folks, do any of you have any idea of what our Nation's Merchant Marine Academy stands for, what it's done throughout our history as a Union, and what it means to the continued commerce and integrity of our great nation?
Ok, sound's like sour cheese sauch to most of you, but WWI said otherwise, that everyone in the US joined together, then.
WhoWee said:Btw - sand is a good alternative and a quick water re-load could be fun as well - most anything will sink a fishing boat.
nismaratwork said:All good, but then they'd just use anti-air weaponry, or even small arms... and yes, I know you're kidding.
I'm genuinely a fan of the hellfire missiles, although I think a tank-killer main gun would work.
WhoWee said:Well, if they think they're allowed to shoot back - there won't be much swimming.
nismaratwork said:I don't think they should be given any chance beyond the standard IFF confirmation, radio, and optical semaphore. Fail that, resist boarding, and you're driftwood and mist: piracy has to be battled wtih 0 tolerance... the oceans are too large.
Vanadium 50 said:The problem is that US policy is that this is a law enforcement issue. You have to collect evidence, capture the pirates, fly them back to the US, give them a lawyer, and let the the courts see if they can increase the number of pirates convicted in the last century from 5 to 6. You can't just sink them.
WhoWee said:The point of my posts was to say it's time to send them a message - enough.
Vanadium 50 said:...You can't just sink them.
nismaratwork said:That position needs to change, which is my point; if Ollie North can be a free man on Fox News, then we can sink some pirates and eat the scandal later.
dlgoff said:Why the hell not. With a drone missile who would ever know?
I wonder how many people here even remember North? Let alone what he did.
A position change is needed and missiles seem like a good idea to me.
Vanadium 50 said:The problem is that US policy is that this is a law enforcement issue. You have to collect evidence, capture the pirates, fly them back to the US, give them a lawyer, and let the the courts see if they can increase the number of pirates convicted in the last century from 5 to 6. You can't just sink them.
mugaliens said:Back at home, in more than half the U.S. States, it's referred to the "Castle Law." Bottom line: All of us, whether in our home, apartment, or sailboat, should, can, and will be free from unauthorized actions contrary to the normal course of events.
That's the nice of saying what's reflected in most state laws such that those who illegally bust down a door are likely to wind up dead for having illegally violated a home.
jarednjames said:This is where the UK falls down, badly. I can legally eject a person from my property using appropriate force as necessary. However, any damage or injuries they sustain from me doing so, I am liable for. This is complete BS as far as I'm concerned.
As a nation we're more interested in the welfare of criminals and non-citizens than we are of the law law abiding citizens and persons in the country.
We need to readjust our attitude - perhaps start with the pirates and blow them out of the water...
Oh wait, we've just made some serious cut backs and couldn't defend our country let alone against pirates - Go UK government!
nismaratwork said:Wow.. that's absolutely absurd.