Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Planar Intersections (Answer Check)

  1. May 13, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Solve the following systems and interpret the result geometrically
    x - y - 2z - 3 = 0
    2x - 3y - 3z + 15 = 0
    x - 2y - z + 10 = 0

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution

    x - y - 2z - 3 = 0…………….(1)
    2x - 3y - 3z + 15 = 0……….(2)
    x - 2y - z + 10 = 0…………..(3)

    first multiply equation (1) by -2


    Use elimination:

    -(2x - 3y - 3z + 15 = 0)



    -(x - 2y - z + 10 = 0)


    ==> y-z=13

    Use elimination:


    Use elimination


    The answer is 0=number..This means that the system is inconsistent, and the planes never intersect.

    I would really appreciate it if someone could take a look over my working, and point out any mistakes.

    Thanks! :smile:
  2. jcsd
  3. May 13, 2010 #2
    Your working looks right to me, so the system is inconsistent like you said. However, be careful. In this case every pair of planes does intersect in a line. You can see this because parallel planes have proportionate coefficients for each independent variable and different constant terms. What is the actual (more precise) geometric interpretation?
  4. May 13, 2010 #3
    Thanks Tedjn

    So, there is an intersecting line? because I'm really confused; isn't 0=8 a false statement, meaning that the planes are neither parallel, nor they intersect. Is this an example of planes intersecting in pairs? could you please elaborate a little.

    Thanks! :smile:
  5. May 13, 2010 #4
    Yes, the planes do intersect in pairs. Most books have a picture of this occurring but where the three planes do not intersect together at any point or line, so that the system has no (simultaneous) solution.
  6. May 13, 2010 #5
    Thank you.

    Just one more question: when it says to interpret the result geometrically, do I have to graph it? or is it just stating the facts that we discussed above?
  7. May 13, 2010 #6
    I believe just explaining the facts would be enough. If you are artistic, you might draw a simple picture illustrating how such pairwise intersections might look, but nothing accurate is probably required.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook