Plane EM wave Euler's identity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the representation of electromagnetic (EM) waves using Euler's identity. It establishes that both the electric field, represented as $$\vec E = E_0 \cos(kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \hat x$$, and the magnetic field, $$\vec B = B_0 \cos(kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \hat y$$, are in phase, meaning they reach their maximum and minimum values simultaneously. The use of complex exponentials, such as $$\vec E = E_0 e^{i(kz - \omega t + \phi_0)}$$, simplifies mathematical manipulations but ultimately only the real parts of these expressions are utilized in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and Euler's identity
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their representations
  • Basic principles of wave propagation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Maxwell's equations
  • Learn about the implications of phase relationships in wave mechanics
  • Explore the use of complex numbers in physics, particularly in wave analysis
  • Investigate the role of the real and imaginary components in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying wave mechanics or electromagnetic theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mathematical representation of EM waves.

Goodver
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
For EM wave, magnetic and electrical components are in phase, meaning when E = 0, then B = 0.

Thus, I understand if it is written:

f(x,t) = A(cos(kx - wt) + icos(kx - wt))

Then why plane wave is always described:

f(x,t) = Aei(kx-wt) = A(cos(kx-wt) + isin(kx - wt))

Implying that Real and Imaginary components are not in phase, which is not the case?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric versus magnetic fields have nothing to do with real versus imaginary numbers. If you have a plane EM wave traveling in the z-direction, with the electric field parallel to the x-axis and the magnetic field parallel to the y-axis, then we have $$\vec E = E_0 \cos (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \hat x \\
\vec B = B_0 \cos (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \hat y$$ where the unit vectors ##\hat x## and ##\hat y## give the directions of the fields.

It makes some mathematical manipulations easier if we write the oscillation using a complex exponential instead of an ordinary trig function: $$\vec E = E_0 e^{i(kz - \omega t + \phi_0)} \hat x = E_0 \left[ \cos(kz - \omega t + \phi_0) + i \sin (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \right] \hat x \\ \vec B = B_0 e^{i(kz - \omega t + \phi_0)} \hat y = B_0 \left[ \cos(kz - \omega t + \phi_0) + i \sin (kz - \omega t + \phi_0) \right] \hat y$$ but in this case it is always understood that in the end we use only the real part of the final result of our calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Goodver

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
669
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K