Plane waves not physical states?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical interpretation of plane waves in quantum mechanics, specifically their correspondence to non-physical states. Plane waves, represented by the function e^{\mathrm{i} \vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}, are eigensolutions of the free particle Hamiltonian but are not square integrable, making them non-normalizable. While they can be approximated using wave packets or periodic boundary conditions, true plane waves do not exist in the real world. The conversation highlights that in scattering calculations, plane waves can serve as useful approximations, particularly when the potential is weak and the wavefunction is predominantly centered around a single momentum value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hilbert space concepts
  • Familiarity with wave functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of scattering theory and its applications
  • Basic grasp of Fourier transforms and wave packets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-normalizable states in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about wave packet formation and its significance in quantum theory
  • Explore scattering theory and its mathematical foundations
  • Investigate the role of periodic boundary conditions in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of wave functions and scattering phenomena.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

In quantum mechanics, it is postulated that the physical states of a system correspond to the points on the unit sphere in the associated Hilbert space.

And yet, people freely talk about e.g. scattering of plane waves by a potential? What does e^{\mathrm{i} \vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}} correspond to physically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plane waves are the eigensolutions of the free particle Hamiltonian, and therefore correspond to free particles.

As you point out though, a plan wave is not square integrable and is thus not normalizable. This does pose a problem, but there are several ways around it. For instance, we can work with traveling wave packets or apply periodic boundary conditions to obtain a normalizable form of the solution.
 
Yep, we can form wave packets out of superpositions of planes waves of differing frequency, but at the end of the day the plane wave itself is non-physical right? Ie we don't see plane waves in the real world.
 
jdstokes said:
Yep, we can form wave packets out of superpositions of planes waves of differing frequency, but at the end of the day the plane wave itself is non-physical right? Ie we don't see plane waves in the real world.

The more precisely the momentum of the particle is defined, the more exactly it's wavefunction will look like a plane wave. For reasons above, the wavefunction will never be a true plane wave, but a very dispersed wavepacket will look like a plane wave near the center.

If you put your particle in a box, then plane waves are normalizable, and depending on the state, may indeed be a good approximation. When blackbody radiation is discussed, the modes of the cavity are plane waves, although of course these aren't strictly wavefunctions.

Finally, when we do scattering calculations we often assume an approximately monoenergetic beam of particles scattering off of some target (perhaps another beam). Although the plane wave description isn't good everywhere, the calculation receives its dominant contribution from the center of the scattering potential, and, as long as the potential is weak, we can say that the incident wave is well approximated by a plane wave. This is because the wavefunction

:\psi(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int^{\,\infty}_{-\infty} A(k) ~ e^{i(kx-\omega(k)t)} \,dk

is appproximately a plane wave as long as A(k) has support mainly around a single value of k.
 
Seeing in the real world? But you are commenting as if we actually see a regular wave function in the real world, but this is of course another discussion.

My guess is that the fact that the plane waves are not in the Hilbert space but can be approximated arbitrarily close is related to the idea that measurements in the continuous spectrum can not be measured to perfect accuracy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K