Planetary and atomic systems in N dimensions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves estimating the volume fraction of a human head occupied by the brain, considering the head as a sphere with a specific bone thickness. It also explores the implications of dimensionality on the existence of stable atomic and planetary systems in N-dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss how to approach the volume fraction calculation in both three dimensions and N dimensions, with one suggesting the use of r^N for volume in higher dimensions. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the second part of the problem, particularly in relation to Gauss's law and the behavior of fields in different dimensional spaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing links to external resources for further reading. Some express difficulty in understanding the mathematical and physical concepts presented in the referenced papers, indicating a need for clarification rather than a consensus on the problem's resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem, particularly in transitioning from three-dimensional to N-dimensional considerations, and express uncertainty about the implications of dimensionality on physical systems.

black_squirrel
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that a human head is a sphere with the bone thickness 10% of the radius of the
head. Find the fraction of the volume of the head occupied by the brain. Make a similar estimate (forget about factors of pi) in the N-dimensional space (d = N) in the limit N -> infinity.

For the existence of life of our type we must have atomic and planetary systems. Do stable atomic and planetary systems exist for d > 3? We also need to have free particles like electrons moving far away from atoms (for conductivity, and to have ions). Can we have them for d < 3?


The Attempt at a Solution



finding fraction of volume is simple but I don't know how you'd go about making an estimate in the N-dimensional space. would it just be r^N instead of r^3 in the volume?

For the second part, I'm not even sure what the question is trying to get at. I was thinking maybe Gauss law could be used to say that the field of charge is inversely proportional to the area of N-1 dimensional sphere surrounding it. Still that doesn't take me anywhere...any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1 dimension: a line x
2 dimensions: a square x^2
3 dimensions: a cube x^3
...
...
N dimentions: ? x^N
 
robphy said:
Check out:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=809880#post809880
and
(if you have JSTOR access)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0080-4614(19831220)310%3A1512%3C337%3AD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2

wow those are great papers but I'm having a bit of trouble following the math/physics of the second paper and the first one just kind of states Ehrenfest's findings and doesn't explain how he came at those conclusions. I'd appreciate it if you could explain it in a bit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K