Plasma Drag Reduction & Hypersonic Travel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of plasma drag reduction in hypersonic travel, exploring the potential benefits of ionizing gas to reduce drag and heating issues encountered by vehicles traveling at high speeds. Participants consider various methods for achieving gas ionization and the implications for vehicle design and performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a blunt-body object experiences reduced drag when the surrounding gas is turned into plasma, speculating that lower-mass monoatomic ions may facilitate easier passage through the medium.
  • Others argue that the energy required for ionization could be more effectively used for thrust, suggesting that the net speed increase might not justify the energy expenditure on plasma generation.
  • It is noted that for hypersonic vehicles, the significant heating issues might make plasma drag reduction a worthwhile consideration, particularly in the upper atmosphere where ionization may be more feasible.
  • One participant raises the question of the most efficient method to ionize gas in front of a hypersonic vehicle, suggesting options like long electrode spikes, femtosecond laser pulses, or microwaves.
  • A participant points out the distinction between ionization and plasma formation, mentioning that at hypersonic speeds, gas naturally ionizes due to high temperatures, referencing the field of aerothermochemistry.
  • Another participant suggests that the ease of movement through plasma may be attributed to its lower density and the presence of monoatomic constituents compared to larger molecular structures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and efficiency of plasma drag reduction, with no consensus reached on the best method for gas ionization or the overall effectiveness of this approach compared to traditional thrust methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for further exploration of the energy trade-offs involved in ionization versus thrust, as well as the specific conditions under which plasma drag reduction may be advantageous.

sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
I'd heard this was a relatively newer discovery -- that a blunt-body object traveling through a gas experiences a reduction in drag if that same gas is turned into plasma.

I'm haven't read exactly why this occurs, but I'd presume that a gaseous fluid medium becomes easier to pass through if its usual constituent diatomic molecules are broken down into lower-mass monoatomic ions. I don't know -- that's just my guess.

Anyway, I have read skeptics point out that the energy required to ionize the atmosphere in front of your aerobody could instead be applied for greater thrust, with the same net resultant speed increase.

But clearly for hypersonic vehicles, which encounter tremendous heating issues, then perhaps it might then be worth it to channel some energy into the plasma drag reduction rather than purely into thrust, in order to alleviate the frictional heating problems. Additionally, the gas in the upper atmosphere through which the hypersonic vehicle would travel might be a little more readily ionizable, which helps.

What would then be the best, most efficient/effective method to ionize a gas in front of a hypersonic vehicle, in order to mitigate drag and heating effects?
A long electrode spike protruding out in front of the vehicle? Femtosecond laser pulses? Microwaves?
Which way is best?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This sounds similar to supercavitation, though with a plasma bubble in air instead of an air bubble in water. Wonder how you'd supercavitate in a solid–with a liquid bubble?!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercavitation
 
Ionization and turning into a plasma are two different (albeit related) phenomena. At hypersonic speeds, especially reentry, the gas ionizes naturally simply because of the huge temperatures involved. There is an entire field based on modeling that called aerothermochemistry.
 
Okay, I'm just saying that I think the reason that plasma is easier to slip through, is that it's primarily a bunch of monoatomic constituents with lower density, rather than much larger and clunkier molecules.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
29K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
14K