Opinions on a Hypersonic Tunnel based Transportation System

  • Thread starter Thread starter pdcpdcpdc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Opinions System
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a proposed hypersonic tunnel-based transportation system, which aims to mitigate the challenges of hypersonic travel by using a large-diameter tube filled with low-pressure gas, potentially hydrogen, to reduce drag. Critics express significant concerns about safety, particularly regarding the use of hydrogen, and highlight the complexities of managing shockwaves and drag within the tunnel. The feasibility of steering a hypersonic aircraft in such a confined space is questioned, with suggestions that it may be more practical to utilize rail systems instead. The idea of using a tunnel is seen as a way to address sonic boom issues, but the practicality and cost-effectiveness of such a system remain contentious. Overall, while the concept is innovative, it faces numerous technical and safety challenges that need thorough examination.
  • #31
Ground effects at 220 mph and ground effects at 3800 mph are entirely different animals. In fact, to my knowledge, no work has been done on ground effects at that speed because it simply isn't practical. It is a disaster waiting to happen. One tiny anomaly in the flight and the whole thing goes up in a fireball. There just is no time for corrections at that speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm sorry, but do you know how expensive it would be to:
1) Build a tunnel across the Atlantic Ocean that could support itself and the stuff inside it
2) make the train chamber a near VACUUM for its entire length?

First off, the pumps required to maintain vacuum alone would probably use more electricity per year than New York State. Not to mention the maintenance required (this means constant trips to the middle of the ocean for repairs on pumps and generators and associated safety controls). Then you have to worry about maintaining the line. Out there in the middle of the Ocean.

Then, you've got the cost of running the stretch of mag-lev and all the maintenance and repair that goes into that...And you've got to have a method of retrieving passengers if the train malfunctions while way out there along the line (I guess you could put rest stops/platforms out there every so often, but still).

This just does not seem like a more cost effective route than planes...At least not for a while.
 

Similar threads

Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
22K