Opinions on a Hypersonic Tunnel based Transportation System

  • Thread starter Thread starter pdcpdcpdc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Opinions System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a proposed hypersonic tunnel-based transportation system utilizing a rocket-powered aircraft traveling through a low-pressure gas-filled tube. The design aims to reduce drag and mitigate the challenges of hypersonic flight, such as shockwaves and structural weight. However, significant concerns were raised regarding the use of hydrogen due to safety risks, the inefficiency of rocket propulsion, and the complexities of steering within a confined space. Participants emphasized the need for a quantitative analysis of drag and shockwave effects, suggesting that the concept may not be practical without substantial modifications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hypersonic flight dynamics
  • Knowledge of gas dynamics and drag reduction techniques
  • Familiarity with aerospace engineering principles
  • Basic concepts of propulsion systems, particularly air-breathing engines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of hypersonic flight and associated challenges
  • Explore quantitative drag analysis methods for hypersonic vehicles
  • Investigate alternative gases for drag reduction in hypersonic environments
  • Study air-breathing propulsion systems and their feasibility for hypersonic travel
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, transportation innovators, and researchers interested in advanced propulsion systems and hypersonic travel solutions.

  • #31
Ground effects at 220 mph and ground effects at 3800 mph are entirely different animals. In fact, to my knowledge, no work has been done on ground effects at that speed because it simply isn't practical. It is a disaster waiting to happen. One tiny anomaly in the flight and the whole thing goes up in a fireball. There just is no time for corrections at that speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm sorry, but do you know how expensive it would be to:
1) Build a tunnel across the Atlantic Ocean that could support itself and the stuff inside it
2) make the train chamber a near VACUUM for its entire length?

First off, the pumps required to maintain vacuum alone would probably use more electricity per year than New York State. Not to mention the maintenance required (this means constant trips to the middle of the ocean for repairs on pumps and generators and associated safety controls). Then you have to worry about maintaining the line. Out there in the middle of the Ocean.

Then, you've got the cost of running the stretch of mag-lev and all the maintenance and repair that goes into that...And you've got to have a method of retrieving passengers if the train malfunctions while way out there along the line (I guess you could put rest stops/platforms out there every so often, but still).

This just does not seem like a more cost effective route than planes...At least not for a while.
 

Similar threads

Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
23K