MHB Please check find residue problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ognik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Residue
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the residues of the function f(z) = sin(1/z) / (z^2 + a^2), which has simple poles at ±ia. The user initially calculates the residue at ia and arrives at a positive value, while the book states it should be negative. After reviewing the calculations, the user identifies a mistake in the application of the limit and the properties of sine and hyperbolic sine functions. The correct residue at both poles is confirmed to be -sinh(1/a) / (2a). The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the error in the initial calculation.
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hi - I get a different answer from the book, but please also review for correct mathematical language & notation ...

find residues for $ f(z) = \frac{sin(\frac{1}{z}) }{z^2 + a^2} $ There are 2 simple poles, $ \pm ia $ ; also I note that $ {z}_{o}^2 = -a^2 $ which proves useful for simplifying.

$ Res[f, ia] = \lim_{{z}\to{{z}_{0}}}\frac{(z - {z}_{0})sin(\frac{1}{z})}{z^2 - {z}_{0}^2} =
\lim_{{z}\to{{z}_{0}}} \frac{sin(\frac{1}{z})}{z + {z}_{0}} = \frac{sin(\frac{1}{ia})}{2ia} $

Now $ sin(i\theta) = i sinh(\theta) $, so $ Res[f, ia] = \frac{sinh(\frac{1}{a})}{2a} = Res[f, -ia] $

But the book says it should be $ - \frac{sinh(\frac{1}{a})}{2a} $ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ognik said:
But the book says it should be $ - \frac{sinh(\frac{1}{a})}{2a} $ ?
Follow the steps, and try to find your mistake when using $z_0^2=-a^2$
$$\text{Res}[f, ia] = \lim_{{z}\to{ ia}}\frac{(z - ia)\sin \left(\frac{1}{z}\right)}{(z-ia)(z+ia)} = \lim_{{z}\to{ia}} \frac{\sin\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)}{z + ia} = \frac{\sin\left(\frac{1}{ia}\right)}{2ia}$$ $$=\frac{\sin\left(-i\frac{1}{a}\right)}{2ia}=\frac{-\sin\left(i\frac{1}{a}\right)}{2ia}=\frac{-i\sinh\left(\frac{1}{a}\right)}{2ia}=-\frac{\sinh\left(\frac{1}{a}\right)}{2a}.$$
 
Yes, just a silly mistake, thanks Fernando
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K