MHB Please check this complex integral (#2)

Click For Summary
The integral to evaluate is \( \oint \frac{e^{iz}}{z^3}dz \) over a square contour centered at zero, which has a pole of order 3 at \( z = 0 \). The initial approach using residues was incorrect due to an extra derivative taken. Instead, applying the Cauchy Integral formula correctly reveals that the third derivative of \( f(z) = e^{iz} \) at zero is \( -i \). By expressing \( \frac{e^{iz}}{z^3} \) as a power series, the coefficient of the \( z^{-1} \) term is found to be \( -\frac{1}{2} \). Thus, the final result of the integral is \( -\pi i \).
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
An old exam question is: Evaluate $ \oint \frac{e^{iz}}{z^3}dz $ where the contour is a square of sides a, centered at 0. This has a simple pole of order 3 at z = 0

Perhaps using residues, $ Res(f,0) = \frac{1}{2!}\lim_{{z}\to{0}}\d{^2{}}{{z}^2}z^2 \frac{e^{iz}}{z^3} = \frac{1}{2}\lim_{{z}\to{0}} \d{^2{}}{{z}^2}\frac{e^{iz}}{z} $
But this will have z to some power in the denominator, with z -> 0, so I don't think I can do that

Instead I'll try the Cauchy Integral formula, $ \oint \frac{e^{iz}}{z^3}dz = \frac{2 \pi i}{2!}f^{(3)}(0) $, with $f(z) = e^{iz}$
$f(z) = e^{iz}, f^{(3)}(z)=-ie^{iz}, f^{(3)}(0) = -i$ and $ \oint \frac{e^{iz}}{z^3}dz = \pi $
Is all this correct please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is wrong. You took an extra derivative.

You can also write $\frac{e^{iz}}{z^3}$ as a power series and notice the only term with $z^{-1}$ in it has coefficient equal to $\frac{(iz)^2}{(2!)z^3} = -\frac{1}{2z}$

When you integrate $z^{-1}$ over that region you get $2\pi i$. Therefore, the final answer will be,
$$ 2\pi i \times -\frac{1}{2} = -\pi i$$
 
All clear, thanks for the series suggestion as well.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
847
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K