Please get me started on showing that the following limit exists

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingstrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit as x approaches infinity for the expression (x+2)/√x, where x is greater than 0. Participants are exploring the behavior of the limit and whether it exists or not.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial steps for evaluating the limit, with one suggesting dividing each term in the numerator by √x. There are questions about the implications of the limit not existing and whether it can be considered infinite.

Discussion Status

Some participants have attempted to evaluate the limit and are questioning their conclusions about its existence. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the nature of limits as x approaches infinity, and some guidance has been offered regarding the evaluation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the limit may not yield a finite number and discuss the implications of functions diverging as x approaches infinity. There is also mention of the relevance of the condition x > 0 in the context of limits approaching infinity.

kingstrick
Messages
107
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate the limit or show it doesn't exist. (x→∞) lim ((x+2)/√x) where (x > 0)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to solve it if x → c but i don't know how to start it when it goes to infinity. I just need a hint as to how to start the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kingstrick said:

Homework Statement



Evaluate the limit or show it doesn't exist. (x→∞) lim ((x+2)/√x) where (x > 0)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to solve it if x → c but i don't know how to start it when it goes to infinity. I just need a hint as to how to start the problem.
Divide each term in the numerator by √x, and then take the limit.
 
Mark44 said:
Divide each term in the numerator by √x, and then take the limit.

Mark, thanks for responding,

so after evaluating, i found that the limit does not exists... am i correct?
work:
((x+2)/√x)/1 --- Does not exist since the numerator is always bigger than the denominator
x→∞, x > o
 
kingstrick said:
Mark, thanks for responding,

so after evaluating, i found that the limit does not exists... am i correct?
work:
((x+2)/√x)/1 --- Does not exist since the numerator is always bigger than the denominator
x→∞, x > o

That's not what Mark meant. You essentially have the exact same equation you started with. Remember that

[itex]\displaystyle\frac{a + b}{c} = \frac{a}{c} + \frac{b}{c}[/itex].
 
kingstrick said:
so after evaluating, i found that the limit does not exists... am i correct?
work:
((x+2)/√x)/1 --- Does not exist since the numerator is always bigger than the denominator
x→∞, x > o

In one sense, the limit doesn't exist, because (x + 2)/√x gets large without bound as x gets large. In that sense, the limit doesn't exist because it is not a finite number. For limits like this, though, we usually say that the limit is ∞.

Also, because x is approaching infinity, you don't need to say that x > 0.
 
Mark44 said:
In one sense, the limit doesn't exist, because (x + 2)/√x gets large without bound as x gets large. In that sense, the limit doesn't exist because it is not a finite number. For limits like this, though, we usually say that the limit is ∞.

Also, because x is approaching infinity, you don't need to say that x > 0.

So when x → ∞, a function will always either go to a finite number, ∞, or -∞...so will a function then always have a limit in this sense? Oh, nevermind, some functions can diverge, like f(x) = -1^x.
 
kingstrick said:
So when x → ∞, a function will always either go to a finite number, ∞, or -∞...so will a function then always have a limit in this sense? Oh, nevermind, some functions can diverge, like f(x) = -1^x.
Right, except that ##\lim_{x \to \infty}-1^x = -1##

The one you're thinking of is f(x) = (-1)x. Without parentheses, what you wrote is the same as -(1x).
 
Thank you. I think i understand now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K