Please help me interpret my genetic intellgence results

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of genetic intelligence results, highlighting the disparity between acute abilities in reading, spelling, and mathematics versus lower cognitive ability. Participants express skepticism regarding the validity of genetic intelligence tests, emphasizing that intelligence is influenced by numerous factors beyond genetics, such as education and environment. The Amsterdam team's research indicates that the predictive power of genetic tests for intelligence is approximately 5%, rendering them largely ineffective for individual assessments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of genetic testing methodologies
  • Familiarity with cognitive psychology concepts
  • Knowledge of the complexities of intelligence measurement
  • Awareness of the limitations of predictive analytics in genetics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodologies behind genetic intelligence testing
  • Explore cognitive psychology theories related to intelligence
  • Investigate the role of environmental factors in cognitive development
  • Learn about the predictive power of genetic markers in behavioral traits
USEFUL FOR

Individuals interested in genetics, psychologists, educators, and anyone seeking to understand the limitations of genetic intelligence assessments.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How is 'cognitive ability' related to 'reading and spelling ability' and 'mathematical ability'?
Please help me interpret these genetic intelligence results. How can I have acute 'reading and spelling ability', acute 'mathematical ability' and less strong 'cognitive ability'?

intelligence.JPG
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Where did you get this from? Unless it was from a professional psychologist, psychiatrist, or someone else in a closely related field then these results are almost entirely meaningless.

Edit: I just realized this was 'genetic' intelligence results. I've never heard of this before and I would be extremely wary of any test that tries to link genetics with intelligence. The brain is enormously complex and is far more than the sum of its genes. Education, upbringing, the environment, and sheer luck have a great deal to do with how your brain grows and develops.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Laroxe, Ryan_m_b, BillTre and 1 other person
Currently, the genetics of intelligence is not very well understood, and genetic "tests" of intelligence have very little predictive power:
When geneticists use the word prediction, they give it a different meaning than the rest of us do. We usually think of predictions as accurate forecasts for particular situations. At a carnival, you might encounter a man who promises to predict your weight simply by looking you over. If you weighed, say, 130 pounds, and he guessed 132, you might be impressed. If he guessed 232, you’d expect to walk away with a giant teddy bear.

Geneticists are a lot more forgiving about predictions. When they try to predict a trait from a set of genes, their prediction may be dead on, or it may be no better than random. Or, as is almost always the case, it is somewhere in between.

Genes that predict the variation in a trait perfectly in a group of people have a predictive power of 100 percent. If they’re no better than what you’d get from blind guesses, their power is zero. The Amsterdam team tested their 52 genes on thousands of people and concluded that the genes have a predictive power of nearly 5 percent. Their predictions are less than random, but if you used them to predict individual people’s intelligence, you’d give away a whole lot of teddy bears.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science...elligence-tests-are-next-to-worthless/561392/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b, BillTre, alexmahone and 3 others

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
895
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K