Please help me with..Destructive Interference

  • Thread starter Thread starter imatreyu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving destructive interference of light through two slits, specifically focusing on calculating the distance from the slits to a screen based on given parameters such as wavelength and fringe spacing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of the variable m in the context of dark fringes and how it affects the calculations. There is confusion regarding the application of the formula for fringe spacing and the interpretation of m values for different dark fringes.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem by suggesting to write equations for the first and second dark fringes. However, there remains uncertainty about the correct application of m and how it relates to the spacing between the dark fringes.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration with the textbook's explanations and seek clarification on the definitions of the variables involved in the equations. There is an emphasis on understanding the underlying concepts rather than just plugging in numbers.

imatreyu
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light of wavelength 460 nm falls on two slits spaced .3 mm apart. What is the required distance from the slits to a screen if the spacing between the first and second dark fringes is to be 4mm?

Homework Equations



Ydark= ((\lambdaL)/d)(m+1/2)
Using
ydark= .004 m
d= .0003 m
\lambda=4.6e-7 m
L= ? (must find)
m= ? (don't understand)

The Attempt at a Solution


It's basically plug n' chug, but I don't understand what m is supposed to be at all!
The answer is 2.61.

My friend says (m + 1/2) must turn into (3/2 - 1/2) but I don't understand why. . .

Thank you in advance for any help! I really appreciate it. My textbook does a bad job of explaining this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first dark fringe, m=0, and m=1 for the second one.

ehild
 
Thank you for your response, but I'm sorry...I still don't understand how that information translates into what I actually need to put into the equation.

If I'm just using the m value for the second fringe, I have to put m=1 into the equation, which does not yield the correct answer.
 
Write the equation for Y-s of the first and second dark fringe in terms of d and L. The distance between these fringes should be 4 mm.

ehild
 
It is.
However, I still don't have a value for m nor understand what it should be.

Ydark= (wavelength*L)/d (m+1/2)
 
Last edited:
imatreyu said:
It is.
However, I still don't have a value for m nor understand what it should be.

Ydark= (wavelength*L)/d (m+1/2)

m is an integer: 0, 1, 2, 3...

You get the first dark band when m=0, and the second one when m=1. Plug in m=0 , to get an equation for Y1 and m=1 for Y2. The difference between Y2 and Y1 equals 4 mm. Find L. Show your work.

ehild
 
From my understanding, I already know Y from the problem?
L= (Ydark * d)/ lambda(m+1/2)
using .004 m for Ydark, .0003 m for d, 4.6e-7 for lambda

When m= 0, L= 5.217...
When m= 1, L=1.7391...

L1-L2= 3.532 m

Which is, unfortunately, not correct. (Correct answer is 2.61 m) Which is weird because it seems very intuitive, and I am disappointed that it does not correct according to the textbook.


I did find a way to do it correctly: .004*.003/ (4.6 e-7*(3/2 - 1/2)) =2.608=2.61 m
However, I don't understand why the (3/2-1/2) part is correct. . .
 
You need to know the meaning of the symbols in the formula you use. Tell me please what are λ, d, L and Y? Check your lecture notes of your textbook.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K